Inherit the Wind Worth Remembering on Anniversary

November 16th, 2009

Is Evolution A Matter of Opinion?

This is one of the key scenes from the movie “Inherit the Wind” about the so-called “Scopes Money Trial” in Dayton, Tennessee. A teacher was accused of the “crime” of teaching evolution to his class, as we wrote about on our trip to Dayton back in March to highlight Charles Darwin’s 200th birthday and the 150th anniversary of the publication of his revolutionary book, On the Origin of Species.

Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species Turns 150

These are the comments made by the authors of the play, according to a Facebook friend who linked to this YouTube page:

“Inherit the Wind is not history. The events which took place in Dayton, Tennessee, during the scorching July of 1925 are clearly the genesis of this play. It has, however, an exodus entirely of its own.

“The collision of Bryan and Darrow at Dayton was dramatic, but it was not a drama. Moreover, the issues of their conflict have acquired new dimension and meaning in the 30 years since they clashed at the Rhea County Courthouse. So Inherit the Wind does not pretend to be journalism. It is theater. It is not 1925. The stage directions set the time as “Not too long ago.” It might have been yesterday. It could be tomorrow.”
– Lawrence and Lee 1955

The Facebook post was inspired by the comments of a so-called “Bible thumper” who said anyone who “believes” in evolution might be a serial killer. Anyone who “believes” that is a moron, especially since most serial killers we find out are religious nuts.

As I pointed out, one of the problems in our society today, with the partisan split that defines us politically, is that too many people “believe” that everything is a matter of opinion.

Philosophy 101: There are matters of opinion, and then there are matters of fact.

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution gives everyone the right to “believe” in Jesus as a matter of opinion, but after more than 100 years of scientific research, there is no doubt that evolution by natural selection is a matter of fact. Believe it. Or not…

Bookmark and Share

Science Wins Over Religion in Scopes Monkey Trial?

March 9th, 2009

Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species Turns 150

rheaco_courthouse1.jpg
Glynn Wilson
The famous Rhea County Courthouse, where the infamous Scopes Monkey Trial took place

gwcubamug.jpgUnder the Microscope
by Glynn Wilson

DAYTON, Tenn. — Forty-three years after the death of British naturalist Charles Darwin, whose 200th birthday is being celebrated far and wide this year, a few men were sitting around in a Rexall drug store across from the now famous courthouse in this rural Southern town talking politics, science and religion.

In contrast to most of the official accounts of how the so-called “trial of the century” and the “Scopes monkey trial” got started, this was the genesis for an idea for a trial to test the legality of teaching evolution versus creationism in the public schools: A conversation over Coca-Colas at a soda fountain counter. (There’s no official indication whether whiskey was involved).

rexall_drug1b.jpg
Glynn Wilson
A photograph of the drug store where the idea for the Scopes Trial was hatched

You won’t even find this account on the Wikipedia page about the trial, although the evidence is presented in the museum in the basement of the courthouse, and knowledgeable locals know the story.

The way the word got out happened as it often does, with a leak to a newspaper reporter, in this case the old Chattanooga Times. The old paper published by Adolph Ochs, who had purchased the New York Times in 1898 and started the world’s first “objective” newspaper, ran a brief about the idea of a trial.

That was picked up by the Associated Press and ran in newspapers across the country, bringing the idea to the attention of the American Civil Liberties Union. The group had offered to finance a test case against the Butler Act, a Tennessee law passed in 1925 making it illegal for any state-funded public school teacher to deny the literal Biblical account of human origins from Genesis and to teach Darwin’s evolution through natural selection in its place.

From there, local officials, who ran with the idea of a trial to promote the town and boost tourism in the area, pushed the idea. It worked in the end, in a way. The town has tourism to this day because of the trial. Although like they do at people all over the red South, people come to gawk at them as a joke way more than something to be taken seriously. No matter.

If you take the trip to Dayton and talk to some of the people, they will just try to save your immortal soul anyway if you give them half a chance. If you talk to some of the people in the know who work in the courthouse every day, you will find a few who know the real story, but far more who still believe more in the creation myth than the science that became world famous in part because of the “trial of the 20th century” in their town.

john_fine2b.jpg
Glynn Wilson
John Fine, a clerk in the Rhea County Courthouse

According to John Fine, a clerk who has worked in the historic courthouse much of his adult life, there are way more people from England and Australia who come to town interested in the history than the people who live their entire lives in Rhea County. He said the people of the area are aware of the history mainly due to news coverage of the annual re-enactment of the trial each June. But he acknowledged that they don’t seem to know or care that much about the international significance of the event — or to be much more knowledgeable about science as a result of the exposure.

“The vast majority of people here are very much still in support of creationism, and that would include me,” he said in an interview.

Nearby Bryan College, a so-called Christian liberal arts college, was founded in 1930 in the aftermath of the 1925 Scopes trial specifically to conduct research on the alleged “theory” of creationism and to teach it at the college level. It was named after the great populist politician William Jennings Bryan, who died in Dayton five days after an emotional performance prosecuting high school teacher John Scopes.

Famous attorney Clarence Darrow, who defended Scopes, may have lost the trial in the eyes of the jury, but not in the eyes of the world. There is little doubt the trial had a lasting impact on American culture.

As an icon of the triumph of science over religion, the Scopes trial would enter into the American imagination primarily through the somewhat cynical reporting of H.L. Mencken, who covered the trial not so objectively for the Baltimore Sun.

It could be argued that while religious people still seize on the trial victory as a win for god over science, what has endured from the Scopes trial is basically the agenda of civil liberties advocates and one of the most basic tenants of American democracy. That is, state legislatures should stay out of the business of regulating religion. It is not their place under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to limit freedom of scientific inquiry, based on the method of forming hypotheses from the observation of empirical data to the formulation of scientific theories. Also, a legal, secular democratic society should respect the value of academic freedom and not allow the creation of laws that undermine the very idea of self-governance itself.

The vast majority of scientists now agree that Darwin’s work building the theory of evolution was one of the most critical in all of science. On this 150th anniversary of the publication of On the Origin of Species, it would be nice if more of the people in Dayton — and America at large — would become educated on this fact.

Isn’t it about time we stopped playing guessing games with the origin of the universe based on a religious screed written almost 1,500 years before science proved that the earth revolves around the sun?

A view from inside the famous courtroom where the Scopes Trial was held, including the original jury seats

Bookmark and Share

British Legislators Call for Public Holiday Honoring Darwin

January 15th, 2009

A group of British legislators says naturalist Charles Darwin’s work should be marked by an annual public holiday in his honor.

Ashok Kumar is one of 10 legislators backing a campaign to make Feb. 12 — Darwin’s birthday — a national holiday.

Kumar said on Wednesday that it would reward “one of Britain’s greatest, if not the greatest, scientific minds.”

The 200th anniversary of Darwin’s birth and the 150th anniversary of his seminal work On the Origin of Species are both being celebrated this year.

Biologist Richard Dawkins, author of The God Delusion, and Nobel Prize winner Francis Crick, one of the scientists who discovered the DNA molecule, have previously called for a public holiday honoring Darwin.

Bookmark and Share