Senator Leahy Rejects Bush’s Executive Privilege Claims

November 29th, 2007

U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy ruled illegal the president’s executive privilege claims protecting long-time political adviser Karl Rove and President Bush’s chief of staff, John Bolten, saying evidence shows the president was not involved in the firings of U.S. attorneys last winter.

Leahy directed Rove, Bolten, former political director Sara Taylor and her deputy, J. Scott Jennings, to comply ”immediately” with their subpoenas for documents and information about the White House’s role in the firings of U.S. attorneys or face contempt charges.

”I hereby rule that those claims are not legally valid to excuse current and former White House employees from appearing, testifying and producing documents related to this investigation,” Leahy wrote.

The ruling clears the way for the comittee to vote on whether to advance contempt citations to the full Senate.

The executive privilege claim ”is surprising in light of the significant and uncontroverted evidence that the president had no involvement in these firings,” Leahy, D-Vt., wrote in his ruling. ”The president’s lack of involvement in these firings - by his own account and that of many others - calls into question any claim of executive privilege.”

AP: Senator Rejects Bush Privilege Claim

This ruling also opens the door to a more detailed investigation of Rove’s role in political prosecutions by the U.S. Department of Justice, now under the control of newly confirmed Attorney General Michael Mukasey.

Interestingly, the right-wing smear machine out of the Montgomery U.S. attorneys office has been strangely quiet in recent weeks since Mukasey’s Senate confirmation. Apparently, one of his first acts upon taking over the reins at Justice was placing a gag order on assistant U.S. attorney Lous Franklin.

Also, sources say Rob Riley, the son of Alabama Gov. Bob Riley, has pulled out of cooperating with CBS’s “60 Minutes,” which could air its show on the case of jailed former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman in the next week or two.

Karl Rove Supreme Court Delivers

November 6th, 2007

by Glynn Wilson

If there was ever any doubt that Karl Rove’s corporate GOP politics dominates the legal landscape of Alabama, those doubts should now be put to rest once and for all. The recent reversal of a $3.6 billion jury award against Exxon Mobil for defrauding the taxpayers of Alabama by the state Supreme Court, now dominated by Republicans elected because of Rove’s political consulting, proves why big business has been so intent to fund a Republican takeover of the courts for years.

Need we remind readers that the case against Exxon Mobile, the largest and most profitable mega-corporation in the history of the world, was brought in the courts by the administration of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman?

Do you think a few cocktails have been hoisted over in Houston, Texas, since Siegelman was ousted as governor by voter fraud in 2002? Can you imagine the celebration this year as Siegelman was sentenced to prision, while the Karl Rove state Supreme Court rolled back the biggest jury verdict in state history?

Why, it’s as if the South finally won the Civil War after all these years, or something. The Mint Julips must just be flowing down in Texasland, while here in hidebound Alabama, we seem content to take it up the ass.

At least the Alabama bureau of the Associated Press managed to crank out a reaction story today from the jury foreman in the case, who said he was “completely shocked” by the court’s judgment.

“I couldn’t sleep that night,” Joey King, a Montgomery elementary school teacher, told the AP in a telephone interview. “I was completely shocked. I thought there might be a few siding with Exxon.” But he did not think it would be a majority.

The state Supreme Court ruled last week that the state failed to prove fraud against Exxon Mobil, in spite of a unanimous jury verdict that said the state did prove fraud. And by a party line vote of 8-1, the court threw out all of the punitive damages in the case awarded by the jury, leaving only $51.9 million in compensatory damages for “breach of contract.”

King said oil company documents presented at the trial showed corporate officials treated Alabama “like we were too dumb to catch” the underpayments, and the jury was convinced the state’s attorneys proved fraud.

The jury decided Exxon Mobil had intentionally underpaid the state for royalties from natural gas wells drilled in state-owned waters along the Alabama Gulf Coast and awarded the state $11.9 billion originally, but that amount was reduced to $3.6 billion by the trial judge.

In Supreme Court Justice Harold See’s opinion, a judge who was elected to the court with Karl Rove’s help, the documents that impressed the jury in the case did not impress him, he said.

Chief Justice Sue Bell Cobb, the court’s lone Democrat, cast the only dissenting vote to allow the jury verdict to stand.

Republican Governor Bob Riley could ask the court to reconsider its decision, but don’t count on it, since Riley also owes his election to Karl Rove.

It just goes to show you that in Bush’s America, you get the justice you pay for. Remind me again why we elect judges in this state at all?

The idea of Jeffersonian Democracy was for the judiciary branch of government to be as removed as possible from mere politics. In Bush’s Christo-Fascist America, even the courthouse is for sale.

What say we throw the money changers out of the courthouses? What would Jesus do?

AP: Jury Foreman Shocked by Exxon Mobil Verdict Being Slashed

Alabama Democratic Party Chairman Joe Turnham slammed the decision in a press release.

A decade of Karl Rove judicial politics during the 1990’s brought tens of millions of dollars from shell groups into these Republican judicial campaigns from corporate contributors such as ExxonMobil, Turnham said.

“Big out of state business unleashed massive financial power in the 2004 and 2006 Supreme Court races on behalf of Republican candidates and the fruit of this can be seen in last week’s lopsided decision against the people of Alabama,” he said. “Republicans on the Supreme Court are themselves addicted to big oil and last week became accomplices in denying Alabama’s citizens real justice by their refusal to award any punitive damages against ExxonMobil for the fraud it perpetrated against Alabama taxpayers.”

As oil approaches $100 per barrel, consumers are preparing to pay record gasoline and heating bills this winter, and Turnham hopes the verdict and other pro-industry decisions in recent years will not be lost on voters in 2008.

“Alabama taxpayers are tired of corporate behemoths building record-breaking profits every year at their expense,” he said. “It is time to replace the corporate board of Republican justices on the Supreme Court with Democratic jurists that understand Alabama’s highest court is not a tool to protect corporate interests.”

“While I respect the judicial process, the court, and the rule of law,” Turnham said, “I would be derelict if I did not remind voters that big corporate money, Republican politics, and pre-determined outcomes have overtaken the Alabama Supreme Court and our political judicial races. Republicans have taken the court into a ‘consumer hell’ and have exorcized the notion of ‘justice for all’ into a realm of ‘those with the most gold get the most favorable rulings’. By avoiding more than $3 billion in punitive damage awards for defrauding our state of oil revenues, ExxonMobil and the Alabama Republican Party have laughed in the face of our people and declared the state’s highest court for sale to the highest bidder.”

Karl ‘Turd Blossom’ Rove Escapes Indictment

June 13th, 2006

President George W. Bush’s chief political adviser and the “architect” of his political career, Karl ‘Turd Blossom’ Rove, escaped indictment in the Valerie Plame-Wilson CIA leak case, according a statement by his lawyer.

Attorney Robert Luskin said he heard the news from special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald on Monday. The news ends months of speculation about Rove’s fate in the case, fed most recently by a story that originated on the left-leaning, non-profit news Web site Truthout in a story written by Jason Leopold.

The announcement cheered Republicans and a White House beleaguered by war and low approval ratings, according to the Associated Press.

Fitzgerald has already secured a criminal indictment against Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, and the investigation continues into whether senior Bush administration officials intentionally leaked the identity of CIA undercover operative Valerie Plame-Wilson in retribution because her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, sharply criticized the administration’s pursuit of war in Iraq, first in a New York Times opinion column.

Rove testified five times before a grand jury, most recently in April. He has admitted speaking with columnist Robert Novak and Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper in the days before they published Plame’s name in July 2003. He did not originally tell prosecutors about his conversation with Cooper, only revealing it after his lawyer discovered a White House e-mail that referred to it, according to the AP.

While Republicans are going to express relief all day long today on cable television news shows, Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean remained on the attack against Rove on NBC’s “Today Show.”

“He doesn’t belong in the White House,” Dean said. “If the president valued America more than he valued his connection to Karl Rove, Karl Rove would have been fired a long time ago. So I think this is probably good news for the White House, but it’s not very good news for America.”

Mainstream Press Fails To Confirm Charges Against Rove

May 15th, 2006

The best we can tell from monitoring the news wires and cable news on Monday, no mainstream news outlet is ready to confirm yet that President George W. Bush’s top political adviser, Karl Rove, is about to be indicted, as reported by the left-leaning non-profit Web site Truthout on Saturday.

The Associated Press moved a story a few minutes ago basically giving Rove a blowjob by talking about his smile. Do they know something we don’t? If so, we would love to see it reported in full.

Karl Rove Could Be Indicted Today?

May 12th, 2006

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews appeared on Don Imus’ show this morning and said Karl Rove could be indicted today, according to the Think Progress blog.

Transcript:

MATTHEWS: If, however, something happens with Karl Rove, we’re going to go to general quarters around here.

IMUS: What does that mean?

MATTHEWS: Meaning we will be taping probably on Saturday or late night because everything will change. Last time, when he picked up Scooter, when he nailed him 30 years of charges, that happened on 1:00 on a Friday. So we don’t know when it might happen, if it’s going happen.

IMUS: Are we expecting something with Karl Rove today?

MATTHEWS: Well, it could be today. It could be next week. Everybody is buzzing about when or if. It’s a big if, big when. There is a lot of talk because he is still being interviewing by the special prosecutor. He keeps being hauled before the grand jury. So something is going on here with the special prosecutor. We don’t know whether he is going to clear him or nail him.

Last night, Matthews reported that the grand jury is meeting today.

Raw Story reports that networks are staking out the courthouse.