Democrats continued to assail President Bush’s policy on Iraq into the night on Tuesday, calling it a catastrophic failure, as the U.S. House of Representatives plunged into monumental debate on a war with dwindling public support that has cost 3,100 troops their lives.
The Democratic leadership set aside most of the week for the historic debate, according to the AP and other news sources, which is projected to culminate Friday in an “damning” vote against a Lame Duck President.
The “bare-bones,” nonbinding resolution will say the House “disapproves of the decision of President George W. Bush … to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq.” The 95-word measure adds: “Congress and the American people will continue to support and protect the members of the United States armed forces who are serving or who have served bravely and honorably in Iraq.”
The debate was the first on Iraq in Congress since Democrats gained control of the House and Senate in midterm elections that swung on voter opposition to the war.
Passage seemed a virtually certainty, sources say. Democratic leaders said they expected no more than one or two members of their rank-and-file to oppose it, and Republicans said that despite lobbying by the White House, they expect at least 24 Republican members to swing for it, which means it would command the votes of at least 250 or 260 votes out of 435, a clear majority offering a stinging rebuke to a Commander in Chief.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he would attempt to pass an identical measure later this month, although Republicans blocked debate on a different proposal critical of the troop increase earlier this winter when Democrats refused to give equal treatment to a Republican alternative.
Democrats made clear the nonbinding measure was the beginning of a longer campaign to bring the war to an end.
“A vote of disapproval will set the stage for additional Iraq legislation, which will be coming to the House floor,” said Speaker Pelosi of California, who underscored the significance of the debate by delivering the first speech.
“In a few weeks, the war in Iraq will enter its fifth year, causing thousands of deaths, tens of thousands of casualties, costing hundreds of billions of dollars and damaging the standing of the United States in the international community,” she said. “And there is no end in sight,”
“The administration’s policy on Iraq has failed. It failed yesterday, it’s failing today, and it will fail tomorrow,” said Rep. Peter Welch of Vermont, serving his first term in Congress after winning his seat last fall. “These failures have left America weakened, not strengthened.”
Rep. John Dingell of Michigan, who served in World War II and has been in Congress since 1955, joined the choir.
“When faced with a choice of approving of the president’s policy or giving a vote of no confidence, the choice is easy,” he said. “I cannot support, nor will I condone, any policy that continues the long train of failure that brought us to this point.”