Karl 'Turdblossom' Rove Steps in Richmond Doodoo

August 12th, 2008

So it turns out Bush’s “brain” ain’t so brainy after all. After belittling the town of Richmond and Virginia’s governor Sunday on the CBS News show Face the Nation, Rove may have done more to hand the red state over to the Democrats in the 2008 election than all of the money Obama is spending to try and win the state come November.

The local reaction to Rove’s “patronizing” comments was swift and not kind, making it look like the former White House political aide Bush liked to call “turdblossom” had stepped in one gigantic pile of doodoo.

“As finance director of the Virginia GOP, Karl Rove lived in Richmond during the mid-1970s. But he didn’t learn much about our city,” according to a local commentator. “How else do you explain the political hatchet man’s patronizing comments about Richmond during an attempt to denigrate Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, the former Richmond mayor who is being considered for Barack Obama’s running mate?”

ThinkProgress.org covered it this way:

Richmond Residents Chastise Rove For His ‘Patronizing’ And ‘Belittling’ Comments About Their City

Last Sunday on CBS’s Face the Nation, Karl Rove attacked Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine (D) by offering the following “patronizing comments” about the city of Richmond, Virginia:

With all due respect again to Governor Kaine, he’s been a governor for three years, he’s been able but undistinguished. I don’t think people could really name a big, important thing that he’s done.

He was mayor of the 105th largest city in America. And again, with all due respect to Richmond, Virginia, it’s smaller than Chula Vista, California; Aurora, Colorado; Mesa or Gilbert, Arizona; north Las Vegas or Henderson, Nevada. It’s not a big town.

The residents of the Virginian capital are not taking Rove’s comments lying down. In an article entitled, “In belittling Richmond’s size, Rove shows he’s out of touch,” Richmond Times Dispatch journalist Michael Paul Williams writes, “Wow. And Republicans call Democrats elitist.”

“It appears that Karl Rove will swiftboat anyone, including cities,” said Del. Dwight Clinton Jones (D), a candidate for mayor.

City Council President and mayoral candidate William Pantele added, “Richmond has more in culture, history and business than all those cities [cited by Rove] put together. And so, perhaps Mr. Rove would like to come see how terrific a place this is, the capital city of Virginia, rather than just taking shots on a news show.”

Williams notes that if physical size is such an important consideration, the current Vice President shouldn’t have been selected. It should be pointed out that Cheney’s political career began in Wyoming, the least populous state in the nation. With fewer than 525,000 residents, it’s less than half the size of the Richmond metro area.

In a web-video posted on the Richmond Times Dispatch site, Williams calls Rove’s comments a “cynical and misguided viewpoint, out of touch with America and the real people with real problems who reside there.”

The backlash from Richmond continues today: Dear Karl Rove, Ain’t You Got No More Sense Than That?


Karl Rove On Face The Nation, Aug.10.

We report you decide.

Should Rove be on TV making these kinds of political comments? Or in jail for contempt of Congress?

Comments welcome…

Bookmark and Share

McCain Losing Electoral Ground Even in Alabama?

August 8th, 2008

Presumptive Republican presidential candidate and Senator John McCain maintains a 12 percent lead over Democrat Barack Obama in Alabama, according to Gerald W. Johnson of the Capital Survey Research Center. However, McCain has dropped some 10 points since June while the undecided and other vote increased 10 points.

“The relevant question is where does the undecided vote go?” he asks.

The numbers probably underestimate the Obama vote by 2-4 percent for two reasons, he said. One, cell phone use is heavier for younger and Black A-A voters and just cell phone users are not included in the data and the vote in these categories are primarily Obama. Two, the numbers do not include new registrations which are up for Democrats, including Black and younger voters, and down for Republicans.

Also, he said in a statement, the vote is heavily specified by demographic variables.

“That is, the McCain vote is stronger among voters with higher rates of church attendance, older age, higher income, males and rural residence,” he said. “McCain gets one percent of the Black vote while Obama gets 15 percent of the white vote.”

Read more about it on the Alabama Education Association Website.

Bookmark and Share

Obama Makes History, Claims Presidential Nomination

June 4th, 2008

Senator Barack Obama, the presumptive nominee of the Democratic Party for president of the United States, made history last night by becoming the first African-American to have a real shot at the White House.

So for the record, here is the text of his speech Tuesday night in St. Paul, Minnesota:

barack_obama4.jpg
Glynn Wilson
Barack Obama speaking in Birmingham last year

Tonight, after fifty-four hard-fought contests, our primary season has finally come to an end.

Sixteen months have passed since we first stood together on the steps of the Old State Capitol in Springfield, Illinois. Thousands of miles have been traveled. Millions of voices have been heard. And because of what you said – because you decided that change must come to Washington; because you believed that this year must be different than all the rest; because you chose to listen not to your doubts or your fears but to your greatest hopes and highest aspirations, tonight we mark the end of one historic journey with the beginning of another – a journey that will bring a new and better day to America. Tonight, I can stand before you and say that I will be the Democratic nominee for President of the United States.

I want to thank every American who stood with us over the course of this campaign – through the good days and the bad; from the snows of Cedar Rapids to the sunshine of Sioux Falls. And tonight I also want to thank the men and woman who took this journey with me as fellow candidates for President.

At this defining moment for our nation, we should be proud that our party put forth one of the most talented, qualified field of individuals ever to run for this office. I have not just competed with them as rivals, I have learned from them as friends, as public servants, and as patriots who love America and are willing to work tirelessly to make this country better. They are leaders of this party, and leaders that America will turn to for years to come.

That is particularly true for the candidate who has traveled further on this journey than anyone else. Senator Hillary Clinton has made history in this campaign not just because she’s a woman who has done what no woman has done before, but because she’s a leader who inspires millions of Americans with her strength, her courage, and her commitment to the causes that brought us here tonight.

We’ve certainly had our differences over the last sixteen months. But as someone who’s shared a stage with her many times, I can tell you that what gets Hillary Clinton up in the morning – even in the face of tough odds – is exactly what sent her and Bill Clinton to sign up for their first campaign in Texas all those years ago; what sent her to work at the Children’s Defense Fund and made her fight for health care as First Lady; what led her to the United States Senate and fueled her barrier-breaking campaign for the presidency – an unyielding desire to improve the lives of ordinary Americans, no matter how difficult the fight may be. And you can rest assured that when we finally win the battle for universal health care in this country, she will be central to that victory. When we transform our energy policy and lift our children out of poverty, it will be because she worked to help make it happen. Our party and our country are better off because of her, and I am a better candidate for having had the honor to compete with Hillary Rodham Clinton.

There are those who say that this primary has somehow left us weaker and more divided. Well I say that because of this primary, there are millions of Americans who have cast their ballot for the very first time. There are Independents and Republicans who understand that this election isn’t just about the party in charge of Washington, it’s about the need to change Washington. There are young people, and African-Americans, and Latinos, and women of all ages who have voted in numbers that have broken records and inspired a nation.

All of you chose to support a candidate you believe in deeply. But at the end of the day, we aren’t the reason you came out and waited in lines that stretched block after block to make your voice heard. You didn’t do that because of me or Senator Clinton or anyone else. You did it because you know in your hearts that at this moment – a moment that will define a generation – we cannot afford to keep doing what we’ve been doing. We owe our children a better future. We owe our country a better future. And for all those who dream of that future tonight, I say – let us begin the work together. Let us unite in common effort to chart a new course for America.

In just a few short months, the Republican Party will arrive in St. Paul with a very different agenda. They will come here to nominate John McCain, a man who has served this country heroically. I honor that service, and I respect his many accomplishments, even if he chooses to deny mine. My differences with him are not personal; they are with the policies he has proposed in this campaign.

Because while John McCain can legitimately tout moments of independence from his party in the past, such independence has not been the hallmark of his presidential campaign.

It’s not change when John McCain decided to stand with George Bush ninety-five percent of the time, as he did in the Senate last year.

It’s not change when he offers four more years of Bush economic policies that have failed to create well-paying jobs, or insure our workers, or help Americans afford the skyrocketing cost of college – policies that have lowered the real incomes of the average American family, widened the gap between Wall Street and Main Street, and left our children with a mountain of debt.

And it’s not change when he promises to continue a policy in Iraq that asks everything of our brave men and women in uniform and nothing of Iraqi politicians – a policy where all we look for are reasons to stay in Iraq, while we spend billions of dollars a month on a war that isn’t making the American people any safer.

So I’ll say this – there are many words to describe John McCain’s attempt to pass off his embrace of George Bush’s policies as bipartisan and new. But change is not one of them.

Change is a foreign policy that doesn’t begin and end with a war that should’ve never been authorized and never been waged. I won’t stand here and pretend that there are many good options left in Iraq, but what’s not an option is leaving our troops in that country for the next hundred years – especially at a time when our military is overstretched, our nation is isolated, and nearly every other threat to America is being ignored.

We must be as careful getting out of Iraq as we were careless getting in – but start leaving we must. It’s time for Iraqis to take responsibility for their future. It’s time to rebuild our military and give our veterans the care they need and the benefits they deserve when they come home. It’s time to refocus our efforts on al Qaeda’s leadership and Afghanistan, and rally the world against the common threats of the 21st century – terrorism and nuclear weapons; climate change and poverty; genocide and disease. That’s what change is.

Change is realizing that meeting today’s threats requires not just our firepower, but the power of our diplomacy – tough, direct diplomacy where the President of the United States isn’t afraid to let any petty dictator know where America stands and what we stand for. We must once again have the courage and conviction to lead the free world. That is the legacy of Roosevelt, and Truman, and Kennedy. That’s what the American people want. That’s what change is.

Change is building an economy that rewards not just wealth, but the work and workers who created it. It’s understanding that the struggles facing working families can’t be solved by spending billions of dollars on more tax breaks for big corporations and wealthy CEOs, but by giving a the middle-class a tax break, and investing in our crumbling infrastructure, and transforming how we use energy, and improving our schools, and renewing our commitment to science and innovation. It’s understanding that fiscal responsibility and shared prosperity can go hand-in-hand, as they did when Bill Clinton was President.

John McCain has spent a lot of time talking about trips to Iraq in the last few weeks, but maybe if he spent some time taking trips to the cities and towns that have been hardest hit by this economy – cities in Michigan, and Ohio, and right here in Minnesota – he’d understand the kind of change that people are looking for.

Maybe if he went to Iowa and met the student who works the night shift after a full day of class and still can’t pay the medical bills for a sister who’s ill, he’d understand that she can’t afford four more years of a health care plan that only takes care of the healthy and wealthy. She needs us to pass health care plan that guarantees insurance to every American who wants it and brings down premiums for every family who needs it. That’s the change we need.

Maybe if he went to Pennsylvania and met the man who lost his job but can’t even afford the gas to drive around and look for a new one, he’d understand that we can’t afford four more years of our addiction to oil from dictators. That man needs us to pass an energy policy that works with automakers to raise fuel standards, and makes corporations pay for their pollution, and oil companies invest their record profits in a clean energy future – an energy policy that will create millions of new jobs that pay well and can’t be outsourced. That’s the change we need.

And maybe if he spent some time in the schools of South Carolina or St. Paul or where he spoke tonight in New Orleans, he’d understand that we can’t afford to leave the money behind for No Child Left Behind; that we owe it to our children to invest in early childhood education; to recruit an army of new teachers and give them better pay and more support; to finally decide that in this global economy, the chance to get a college education should not be a privilege for the wealthy few, but the birthright of every American. That’s the change we need in America. That’s why I’m running for President.

The other side will come here in September and offer a very different set of policies and positions, and that is a debate I look forward to. It is a debate the American people deserve. But what you don’t deserve is another election that’s governed by fear, and innuendo, and division. What you won’t hear from this campaign or this party is the kind of politics that uses religion as a wedge, and patriotism as a bludgeon – that sees our opponents not as competitors to challenge, but enemies to demonize. Because we may call ourselves Democrats and Republicans, but we are Americans first. We are always Americans first.

Despite what the good Senator from Arizona said tonight, I have seen people of differing views and opinions find common cause many times during my two decades in public life, and I have brought many together myself. I’ve walked arm-in-arm with community leaders on the South Side of Chicago and watched tensions fade as black, white, and Latino fought together for good jobs and good schools. I’ve sat across the table from law enforcement and civil rights advocates to reform a criminal justice system that sent thirteen innocent people to death row. And I’ve worked with friends in the other party to provide more children with health insurance and more working families with a tax break; to curb the spread of nuclear weapons and ensure that the American people know where their tax dollars are being spent; and to reduce the influence of lobbyists who have all too often set the agenda in Washington.

In our country, I have found that this cooperation happens not because we agree on everything, but because behind all the labels and false divisions and categories that define us; beyond all the petty bickering and point-scoring in Washington, Americans are a decent, generous, compassionate people, united by common challenges and common hopes. And every so often, there are moments which call on that fundamental goodness to make this country great again.

So it was for that band of patriots who declared in a Philadelphia hall the formation of a more perfect union; and for all those who gave on the fields of Gettysburg and Antietam their last full measure of devotion to save that same union.

So it was for the Greatest Generation that conquered fear itself, and liberated a continent from tyranny, and made this country home to untold opportunity and prosperity.

So it was for the workers who stood out on the picket lines; the women who shattered glass ceilings; the children who braved a Selma bridge for freedom’s cause.

So it has been for every generation that faced down the greatest challenges and the most improbable odds to leave their children a world that’s better, and kinder, and more just.

And so it must be for us.

America, this is our moment. This is our time. Our time to turn the page on the policies of the past. Our time to bring new energy and new ideas to the challenges we face. Our time to offer a new direction for the country we love.

The journey will be difficult. The road will be long. I face this challenge with profound humility, and knowledge of my own limitations. But I also face it with limitless faith in the capacity of the American people. Because if we are willing to work for it, and fight for it, and believe in it, then I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth. This was the moment – this was the time – when we came together to remake this great nation so that it may always reflect our very best selves, and our highest ideals. Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America.

Bookmark and Share

Obama On His Way to the White House?

February 19th, 2008

Senator Barack Obama seemed well on his way Tuesday to becoming the first African-American to occupy the White House in what could very well turn into a landslide of epic proportions not seen in American politics since 1964, when Lyndon Johnson of Texas buried Barry Goldwater’s racist, conservative campaign.

obama3b.jpg
Glynn Wilson
Senator Barack Obama, on his way…

With a commanding lead in the delegate count after soundly defeating Hillary Clinton in Wisconsin Tuesday night, and all indications pointing to a win in Hawaii, the state of his birth, it is looking more and more like Clinton’s comeback math just can’t add up.

The TV talking heads will not tell you that, however, since they have to keep the interest in the story going now, after trying to wrap the campaign up early in Clinton’s favor just a couple of months ago.

Obama himself addressed a boisterous rally in Houston with a message of caution, trying to keep supporters fired up and donations coming into his campaign coffers, saying he has “months and miles” to go.

Obama literally stole the spotlight from Clinton, beginning his speech before she had finished in Ohio. Cable network producers cut away from her to the man who is now “clearly the front-runner,” according to the Associated Press.

The Illinois senator seemed to echo Clinton in one respect when he agreed “it’s going to take more than rousing speeches” and big rallies to bring change to Washington. Clinton and assured Republican nominee John McCain are both sounding the theme that Obama offers words instead of substance.

“As wonderful as this gathering is, as exciting as these enormous crowds and this enormous energy may be, what we’re trying to do here is not easy,” Obama said. “It is going to require something more. Because the problem that we face in America today is not the lack of good ideas. It’s that Washington has become a place where good ideas go to die.”

Obama insisted he’s not naive.

“Hope is not blind optimism,” he said. It’s as if the cynics are saying “we need to season and stew him a little more and boil all the hope out of him. It is my central premise that the only way we will bring about real change in America is if we can bring new people into the process.”

With an appeal for Texans to take advantage of opportunities to vote in advance of the March 4 primary, he said: “I don’t want you to wait until March 4. I want you to start voting tomorrow.”

The primaries in Texas and Ohio on March 4 offer a mother lode of 334 Democratic delegates and chance to break out of a nomination struggle. But even if Ms. Clinton were to win in those states, not likely considering Obama’s momentum, it is doubtful she can amass enough delegates to catch up.

Obama accelerated his promise to end the war in Iraq in 2009 during his Houston speech. While he originally promised to remove all combat brigades within 16 months of taking office, with President Bush’s plan to draw troops down to 15 brigades this year, he said, means he could complete the removal in a year after taking office.

While Senator John McCain cruised to victory with little opposition in Wisconsin’s Republican Primary, he came out swinging at Obama in a clear indication he’s betting the Illinois Senator will be his opponent in November.

“I’m not the youngest candidate,” McCain said. He’s 71, and the question remains whether his age and health, he’s had skin cancer, can hold up to a grueling general election campaign.

“But I am the most experienced,” McCain said, trying to draw a contrast with the 46-year-old candidate of “hope” who some compare to John Kennedy during his positive campaign as the first Catholic to win the White House in 1960.

Bookmark and Share

Locust Fork News-Journal Endorses Obama

February 18th, 2008

At the risk of having our house burned down by the East Jefferson County and/or the Blount County Ku Klux Klan, The Locust Fork News and Journal is formally endorsing Senator Barack Obama’s candidacy today for the Democratic Party’s nomination for president of the United States.

barack_obama4b.jpg
Glynn Wilson
Obama campaigning in Birmingham in 2008

We do not come to this decision easily or lightly. And while we don’t think a detailed explanation is really necessary, we’re offering this one anyway.

Having grown up in Birmingham in the 1960s and coming of age in the early 1970s when old George Corley Wallace had a stranglehold on this state and its people, largely on the basis of race, I remember when the churches and the schools were first integrated. I remember when the Klan used to take up its collection of hate at the traffic light by the Civitan Park in Center Point.

I remember making friends with the first two “colored” girls who came to our school, and I even remember their names: Johnny Jones and Mary Hawkins. I was there by the Erwin High School bandroom in the drum line when the fights broke out between the first black students bused from downtown Birmingham and the rednecks who attacked them with baseball bats and motorcycle chains.

I know people who are still racists in this part of the world, and as hard as it is to believe, I still hear the “N” word uttered here from time to time, most recently this past Saturday night.

But I left Birmingham a number of years ago and attended college at the University of Alabama and got a real education, which will do much to enlighten a person’s mind on these matters. And I have lived in other places, including the diverse New Orleans, where the races had a much longer history of mixing. I even got to play the drums with some of that great city’s best black blues musicians, and came to be friends with a few, including Walter “Wolfman” Washington.

So it gives me no particular pause to endorse a man with black skin for president, especially one as intelligent and unflappable as Mr. Obama. The pundits can’t crack him and Senator John McCain won’t be able to either. Plus, he has demonstrated his ability to run a ground campaign and raise the massive amount of money it takes to run a presidential campaign in this crazy world.

Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark and Share

Clinton, McCain Lead Delegate Count

February 6th, 2008

Hillary Clinton moved ahead of Barack Obama in the race for Democratic Party delegates in the 2008 presidential race on Super Tuesday, while John McCain surged to an overwhelming lead in the Republican Party’s delegate race over Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee.

No candidate in either party came out with enough of a lead to end the party presidential competition just yet, however. So much for the national TV pundits who predicted it would all be over and we would know the identity of the party nominees by today.

Clinton now controls 732 delegates and Obama holds 639, with 2,025 delegates required to claim the nomination at this summer’s convention in Denver.

McCain has now amassed 525 delegates, Romney controls 223 and Huckabee has 145, while It takes 1,191 to win the nomination at this summer’s convention in St. Paul, Minnesota.

Bookmark and Share

Blah, Blah Election Day Blues

February 5th, 2008

They are naming pizzas after presidents over at the Tuscaloosa News political blog. We’re chasing some headlines for the news page, but too burnt to blog until all the results are in and we know what the big story really is…

Meanwhile, here’s some key Websites to check if you are a political junkie who just can’t wait. Of course we would welcome your comments on the primary elections below, unless you are a spammer, of course…

Latest Super Tuesday Results From AP

Washington Post Coverage

New York Times Coverage

Bookmark and Share

Who Won The Clinton, Obama Debate?

January 31st, 2008

Democrats Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton sought common ground Thursday on immigration, health care and tax relief in their first one-on-one debate with just the two of them after John Edwards suspended his candidacy yesterday. But the two left standing in the Democratic Party’s contest for president grew testy at times in trying to distinguish themselves as the candidate best able to handle the responsibilities of the White House.

Just days before the Super Tuesday contests, the two alternated addressing each other cordially with swipes, underscoring the high stakes of the upcoming contests, according to the Associated Press. The debate came on the day when Obama’s campaign reported raising a staggering $32 million in January, cash aplenty to advertise all through the Super Tuesday states, with its nearly two dozen contests from coast to coast.

AP: Obama, Clinton Trade Jabs on Immigration

In your opinion, who won the debate?

Bookmark and Share

John Edwards Suspends White House Run in New Orleans

January 30th, 2008

John Edwards suspended his run for the White House today in the Ninth Ward of New Orleans where he launched his campaign in Dec. 2006. He said it was time to step aside “so that history can blaze its path” in a campaign now left to a woman and an African-American, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

john_edwards2.jpg
Glynn Wilson
John Edwards ends his campaign for president where he started it, in New Orleans

“With our convictions and a little backbone we will take back the White House in November,” Edwards said of the Democratic Party.

Clinton and Obama both pledged in phone conversations that “they will make ending poverty central to their campaign for the presidency,” Edwards said. “This is the cause of my life and I now have their commitment to engage in this cause,” he said before a small group of supporters in Musician’s Village, joined by his wife Elizabeth and his three children, Cate, Emma Claire and Jack.

Edwards told a story about his drive over to make his statement, where he stopped and talked to a number of homeless people living under a bridge. One woman asked him never to forget the homeless and the plight of the poor.

“Well I say to her and I say to all those who are struggling in this country, we will never forget you. We will fight for you. We will stand up for you,” he said, pledging to continue his campaign-long effort to end what he frequently said was “two Americas,” one for the rich and powerful, the other for the poor and struggling, working middle class.

The former North Carolina senator did not immediately endorse either Obama, the strongest black candidate in history, or Clinton, who is seeking to become the first woman president.

Both of them praised Edwards – and immediately began courting his supporters, according to the Associated Press.

“John Edwards ended his campaign today in the same way he started it – by standing with the people who are too often left behind and nearly always left out of our national debate,” Clinton said.

Obama praised Edwards and his wife, Elizabeth.

At a rally in Denver, Obama said the couple has “always believed deeply that two Americans can become one, and that our country can rally around this common purpose. So while his campaign may have ended, this cause lives on for all of us who still believe that we can achieve that dream of one America.”

The impact of Edwards’ decision will be felt next week, when Democrats hold primaries and caucuses in 22 states, with 1,681 delegates at stake.

Four in 10 Edwards supporters said their second choice in the race is Clinton, while a quarter prefer Obama, according to the latest Associated Press-Yahoo poll.

Edwards amassed 56 national convention delegates, most of whom will be free to support either Obama or Clinton.

As expected, Edwards said he was suspending his campaign rather than ending it, but aides said that was simply legal terminology so that he can continue to receive federal matching funds for his campaign donations.

After the announcement, Edwards planned to work with Habitat for Humanity rebuilding one of the homes in Musicians’ Village.

His recent loss in South Carolina, where he was born and he had won in 2004, may have had a lot to do with his decision, along with his wife’s influence.

Bookmark and Share