Archive for the ‘Liberty vs. Security’ Category

Political Justice Under the Spotlight in Washington

June 27th, 2009

Judge U.W. Clemon criticized The Birmingham News and the Bush Justice Department at The National Press Club

by Glynn Wilson

WASHINGTON, D.C. — One of the most significant problems corrupting American society and politics over the past eight years is finally getting the public spotlight it deserves in the nation’s capital. You can’t run a successful democracy without an honest system of justice that is removed as far as possible from politics, according to a panel of experts who spoke at one of the most venerated institutions in the United States, the National Press Club.

Some of the people who came from as far away as Alaska, Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia were a bit disappointed when it was announced that former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman and House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers were not able to make it.

But Elliot Mintzberg, chief counsel for oversight investigations of the House Judiciary Committee, who came in Conyers’ place, insisted that all the investigations are continuing full bore into the politicization of the justice system by the Bush White House and Department of Justice — in spite of a certain camp in Washington who would rather “look forward, not back.”

mincberg2.jpg
Glynn Wilson
House Judiciary Committee investigator Elliot Mintzberg

He said the investigation into the firings of U.S. attorneys and the improper interference of Bush’s White House staff, including political aide Karl Rove, “is not yet done.”

In response to my direct questions about when Karl Rove will be called to testify and the controversy over whether his testimony will be fully on the record and subject to contempt laws, Mintzberg said a date has been set, but he could not reveal it. He insisted the committee will fully probe Rove on the record in a transcribed deposition that will make him subject to perjury if he lies to Congress. He insisted the deposition will be released to the public when the time comes just like the testimony of other witnesses, including Alabama attorney Jill Simpson’s, who made the trip to Washington for the forum. And he said that might very well lead to public hearings.

Mintzberg said investigations are continuing on several fronts.

Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark and Share

Domestic Spying A Paranoid Conspiracy Theory?

June 18th, 2009

Uh, we think not…

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

We have been reporting on this for more than four years now all the way back to the launch of this independent news site. But I guess it takes a New York Times story and an MSNBC story to hit the airwaves for people to finally realize it’s true.

U.S. E-Mail Surveillance Renews Concerns in Congress

Bookmark and Share

ACLU Grades Obama's First 100 Days on Civil Liberties

May 12th, 2009

by Glynn Wilson
Editor and Publisher

Michael W. Macleod-Ball, an attorney who has worked from one end of the country to another from Maine to Alaska, now a legislative policy counsel lobbyist for the American Civil Liberties Union, made a swing around Alabama Tuesday to update activists on where their rights stand under the new Obama administration.

aclu3.jpg
Glynn Wilson
Michael W. Macleod-Ball of the ACLU speaks to a Birmingham crowd about civil liberties

At his stop in Birmingham at a Unitarian church near Homewood after an appearance in Huntsville, he did a quick rundown on the top 10 issues facing Americans after eight long years of George W. Bush in the White House, and graded President Barack Obama on some counts.

On Day One of the new presidency, the group, dedicated to fighting for the Constitutional rights of all Americans, including the free speech rights of racists, wanted to see Obama officially end torture of detainees. He did. Blue star.

They wanted to see Obama close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. He said he would, well, sort of. Maybe half a star.

They wanted to see Obama end the practice of “extraordinary rendition,” a practice used by the Bush-Cheney CIA to abduct and transport anyone, so-called “terror suspects,” to secret prisons around the globe without due process. So far, no star for Obama here either, although he and his staff are “looking at it” and less likely to abuse it as Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld did.

Now at the top of the list for Obama’s First 100 Days, high on the group’s agenda is to fight the “warrantless spying” of “U.S. persons,” meaning American citizens and residents not being called on the phone or e-mailed by al Queda, like peace groups, environmental groups, and well, ACLU activists.

“Things are a lot better under Obama,” he said, although it is not clear yet where the lines will be drawn.

His attorney general, Eric Holder, has made statements supporting the Patriot Act, and Obama and his Harvard cohort here in Alabama, Artur Davis, both voted for the FISA bill, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act used by the Bush administration to justify sweeping up ALL telephone and e-mail communications and Web traffic of ANYONE on the record in opposition to Bush’s policies, including people simply involved in the American political process — even journalists and bloggers.

The group is also highly concerned about routine FBI monitoring of all activists, and they are trying to make some headway with the Obama administration on that, hoping to re-insert the “reasonable suspicion” test into law enforcement.

The problem is Obama will want to retain a high amount of police intelligence due to the resurgence of the militant right.

Next on the ACLU’s list was fighting the “watch lists,” which are riddled with innaccurate information and almost impossible to challenge or change, he said.

“One third of the names are wrong. And there’s no way to get off.”

So far, no action by the Obama administration here, although the group is hopeful.

Freedom of information is also on the list, and the Obama administration gets a blue star here. They immediately reversed the John Ashcroft policy of turning down FOIA requests on the slightest reason, often not even national security. Obama so far has shown a real effort to be transparent, recently releasing many of the Bush administration’s torture memos.

Mr. Macleod-Ball told the crowd of maybe 50 to expect “a sea change” coming in the Department of Justice, especially the Civil Rights Division, although it’s too early to award any stars. Obama has certainly not won anything yet for any work cleaning up the rest of the Justice Department, so polluted by Bush that it will take many moons to fix.

“It takes a long time for those appointments to go through,” Mr. Macleod-Ball said.

This is an especially key issue in Alabama, where the supporters of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman are still waiting to see some justice here in the Southland from the Man, The Obama.

U.S. attorneys Alice Martin and Laure Canary are still around, and Chief U.S. Justice Mark E. Fuller in Montgomery is going to get another crack at sentencing Siegelman soon. The Bush prosecutors are asking for 20 years this time, even though the U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta dropped a couple of counts on appeal.

Prosecutors Want Longer Sentence for Siegelman?

Macleod-Ball said the group is also working on the Real ID Act, an abortion gag rule, working against workplace discrimination against “sexual minorities,” religious discrimination in housing, and still fighting the death penalty. The group is hoping Obama will at the very least place a moratorium on the practice until the legislative bodies can research and ban it forever from the American legal landscape and bring the U.S. in line with every other civilized, industrialized democracy in the West.

Although Obama did end the funding for the sham “abstinence only” programs, which distributed misleading information and did not work on any level, one of the biggest disappointments so far in Obama’s first 100 days is his weak position on “faith-based initiatives.”

“We are disappointed,” he said, “in Obama’s continued funding of religious organizations set up by Bush.”

On the group’s legislative agenda, there is still no judicial review in place for the Patriot Act, although there is glimmering hope that the Democratic Congress will let it expire. Also the way national security letters are issued to banks, libraries and Internet Service Providers should be stopped. The way it is, no one is allowed to challenge in court or even be told they are under investigation.

He indicated the most severe abuses already seem to be stopped under Obama, but the problem is law enforcement used the tools not to fight terrorists, but “for routine law enforcement.”

Obama’s stance so far on “state secrets” is also disappointing.

One of the major issues ahead for the group and this news organization is the fight for legal rights of free speech and press on the Web, including Net Neutrality. The group is also working toward a Shield Act for journalists, although they tend to be in the middle between reporters who want to protect sources and prosecutors who want information about defendants. Key to our legal future is a liberal establishment on who constitutes a journalist, although the experience and education behind this project well qualify.

Macleod-Ball passed through Birmingham on invitation from the Alabama ACLU chapter headed by Olivia Turner, who also gave a rundown on issues the state chapter has been working on, including rights for prisoners, including those with HIV, mental health patients and those in the foster care system, as well as low income women. They also work on voting rights and church-state divide issues, including advocating the removal of the Ten Commandments Judge Roy Moore’s granite rock from the state Supreme Court building.

She said the chapter was started in 1965, “and immediately infiltrated by the FBI.”

Neither the state group or the national group knew much about one of the most egregious violations of civil liberties in American history started right here in Alabama. That would be the Google Earth-Virtual Alabama spying system set up by Governor Bob Riley. But both groups seemed interested in the issue and open to a briefing, which we will provide soon.

Related Links

ACLU
ACLU of Alabama

Bookmark and Share

ACLU of Alabama to Hold Town Hall Meetings on Rights

April 30th, 2009

The American Civil Liberties Union, Alabama chapter, will hold a series of town hall meetings around the state in May to discuss the state of our constitutional rights.

With President Barack Obama now in the White House and with a Democratic Party majority in Congress, do you believe enough is being done to restore our rights so abused by the Bush administration? Here’s your chance to voice your opinion in public for the record.

The questions highlighted in the press release for the events are:

What are President Obama and Congress doing to reclaim our country and restore our rights?

What is the ACLU doing?

How can you help make a difference?

According to Nikki Cox, a spokesperson for the group, a town hall conversation with Michael Macleod-Ball, Chief Legislative and Policy Counsel for the ACLU, will take place around the state in May “to discuss the challenges and outline the steps our elected leaders must take to begin restoring our rights and the Constitution.”

“You’ll be given concrete actions you can take to start making positive change on these issues,” she said. “Our government’s response to 9/11 has left us with a disastrous legacy of bad policies, abuses of power, and civil liberties violations. Attacks have included politicization of the Justice Department, spying on innocent Americans, excessive government secrecy, top-down torture policies, and undermining the civil rights of all Americans.”

The president and Congress need to work together to reverse the damage that has been done to our Constitution, and develop a long-term positive civil rights agenda, she said.

“The Obama Administration and Congress cannot repeat the mistakes of the past the time has come to act and restore our rights, starting now,” she said. “Stand up. Make your voice heard.”

The town hall is free and open to the public. Light refreshments will be provided.

“We’re giving you two opportunities to join us,” she said. “Depending on your calendar and location, please RSVP to either event below:”

The town hall in Huntsville is Monday, May 11, at 6:30 p.m. at the Unitarian Universalist Church of Huntsville (2222 Governors Dr SE).

RSVP now at Huntsville.

The town hall in Birmingham is Tuesday, May 12, at 6:30 p.m. at the Unitarian Universalist Church of Birmingham (4300 Hampton Heights Drive).

RSVP now at Birmingham.

We’ll be there to cover it and will be taking comments on these issues here. These are important issues and we applaud the ACLU for holding these public events.

Bookmark and Share

Electronic Frontier Foundation Questions Obama on Change

April 10th, 2009

This just in from the Electronic Frontier Foundation:

THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HAS EMBRACED BUSH’S POSITION ON
WARANTLESS WIRETAPPING, and goes one step further than the previous administration. In a motion to dismiss Jewel v. NSA, the Obama Administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ) made two deeply troubling arguments.

First, they argued, exactly as the Bush Administration did on countless occasions, that the state secrets privilege requires the court to dismiss the issue out of hand. They asserted that simply allowing the case to continue “would cause exceptionally grave harm to national security.” As in the past, this is a blatant ploy to dismiss the litigation
without allowing the courts to consider the evidence.

Second, the DOJ claimed that the U.S. Government is completely immune from litigation for illegal spying because the USA PATRIOT Act renders the U.S. immune from suit under the two remaining key federal surveillance laws: the Wiretap Act and the Stored Communications Act. This is a radical assertion that is utterly unprecedented. No one — not the White House, not the Justice Department, not any member of Congress, and not the Bush Administration — has ever interpreted the law this way.

This isn’t change we can believe in. This is change for the worse.

We couldn’t agree more…

View the full blog post here.

Bookmark and Share

Here We Go Again on Domestic Spying

April 9th, 2009

Will Obama break his campaign promises on change and transparency?

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

For more, see below:

The U.S. Justice Department under President Obama is invoking Bush Administration tactics to dismiss a lawsuit alleging federal agents engaged in illegal phone and email surveillance of ordinary US citizens.

A motion submitted to US District Judge Walker on Friday claims disclosing information on the National Security Agency’s warrentless wiretapping program would “cause exceptionally grave harm to national security.”

Really?

Obama’s DoJ defends Bush-era wiretaps: Telecom spy program a ‘state secret’

At least attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. began a series of personnel moves yesterday in one of the most sensitive and secretive sections of the Justice Department, part of his effort to restore public confidence in the nation’s highest law enforcement operation. The department has attracted ferocious criticism from judges and defense lawyers who have sounded alarms about unprofessional conduct and raised allegations about political interference in prosecutions during the Bush administration.

Holder Begins Revamp of Embattled Department of Justice

We have been covering these issues more than any news organization or blogger in the country. Our coverage goes all the way back to the very beginning of this Web site four years ago this month. Liberty v. Security and our corrupt justice system are a couple of the recurring themes here.

If you are conducting research or if you are new to this issue, or if you are just finding this Web site and want to review some of our coverage, here is the link to our Archive for Liberty V. Security. Here is the link to our Archive for the Political Justice in America.

As always, your thoughts are welcome — unless you are a dunderhead conservative Christian Republican Auburn engineer with a crewcut who loves al.com : )

Bookmark and Share

John Dean Compares Bush to Nixon

January 24th, 2009

For all my friends who do not have MSNBC included in their corporate cable TV package … or time to watch:


Nuff said…

It’s Yuengling time…

Bookmark and Share

Bush's Illegal Wiretaps Included Financial Data

January 23rd, 2009

NSA whistleblower Russell Tice returned to Countdown to explain how the Bush Administration illegally added complete financial data for people they illegally wiretapped.


Olbermann asked where the program came from, and Tice guessed it was the remnants of Admiral John Poindexter’s “Total Information Awareness” program, which was specifically prohibited by Congress, and the Rumsfeld Department of Defense.

Olbermann also asked who had access to the in-depth information about journalists and what they did with it. Unfortunately Tice was fired when he tried to figure that out.

But it doesn’t take much imagination to answer: Dick Cheney and Karl Rove had access and used it for blackmail and character assassination. For a perfect case study, just look at how they learned Iraq critic Joe Wilson’s wife worked at the CIA – and how they leaked that information to try to destroy him, according to Bob Fertik at Democrats.com.

Bookmark and Share

New York Times Reporter Reacts to New Spying Allegations

January 22nd, 2009

MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann continues looking into the breadth and depth of the Bush administration’s illegal domestic surveillance program with his guest, New York Times investigative reporter James Risen, author of State of War on the CIA.


My reaction? Risen says he could not confirm what Russell Tice said last night about journalists being illegally spied on by the Bush administration, but he said “it’s worth investigating.” Well, duh. I think we knew that.

He said the NSA has “far greater capability” than has “ever been made public,” and that there are parts of the program “we don’t know about,” he said, “including me.”

Coming from one of the top investigative reporters who was spied on and who we assume pushed to have his story published in the Times before his book came out, even though it was held for more than a year, this is a fairly shocking statement when you think about it. The fact is…

Read the rest of this entry »

Bookmark and Share