Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star And Other Fairy Tales in the News

Print

Be Sociable, Share!

“Twinkle, twinkle, little star. How I wonder what you are.”
- From the 19th-century English poem, “The Star,” by Jane Taylor –

The Big Picture

by Glynn Wilson

Way to go, working folks. You voted for former Riley aide Twinkle Cavanaugh for the Alabama Public Service Commission, and now you’ve got it. A twinkle, twinkle little star who is going to go out of her way to become even more of a Newhouse media star by drumming up fake controversies and driving traffic to the Newhouse/Advent/al.com nut job comment section.

Twitter and Facebook are all atwitter for the past few days over a combination of stories provided to titillate online viewers. But I’m here to tell you, it is all sound and fury signifying nothing.

Now I am reluctantly going to feed the media frenzy, because it didn’t take me but a minute of checking around to find out what’s really afoot here.

It all started when Ben Raines of the Mobile Press Register did a story indicating that Alabama Power customers pay more for electricity rates than people hooked up to Georgia Power, a state also served by Southern Company.

If you thought you were getting real, honest news here independent of corporate influence, think again. You can see the Alabama Power “Always On” ad right on the damn story online.

Then came another story about Public Service Commissioner Terry Dunn, who thought it might be a good idea to take a look at the rates to make sure they are fair. That is, after all, the sole job of the Public Service Commission. And he’s no liberal Democrat. He’s a Republican with the Dunn Development Corporation and Dunn Investment Group who has held the state license in municipal utilities contracting for the past 25 years, according to Wikipedia and other sources.

Of course Dunn was immediately shouted down by other Republicans, including Twinkle, who voted with the other Republicans on the commission to block any formal rate review, according to the conservative Birmingham News, for the sole purpose to “exclude environmentalists” from any discussion of such a thing as doing the job she was elected to do.

Now there’s an e-mail making the rounds from the so-called JobKeeper Alliance from a Republican public relations guy named Patrick V. Cagle of the Southeastern Strategy Group, who is spearheading the campaign to fool unions and union members into believing that “radical environmentalists” are out to get their jobs.

Nothing could be further from the truth, but that never stopped any Karl Rove clone from drumming up a fake controversy to distract people from the real economic issues at hand and get them all divided up into little camps so they can be defeated at the polls.

It’s a classic divide and conquer strategy designed to make working folks think anyone who advocates for clean air and water must be a radical, flag burning hippie and an enemy of America.

The problem is, it just might work in this case, because the fake controversy also happens to serve perfectly the monopoly media strategy of Newhouse, which owns al.com. There’s nothing like a little controversy to drum up traffic for a Website that is clearly designed to bankrupt the newspapers and get everybody in the state hooked on the anonymous, right-wing comment section. They’ve never done an honest story on organized labor in their 100-plus years of publishing. Newspaper publishers, or owners, you see, have always, always been anti-union. They’ve fought reporters unions and pressmen unions since the advent of the Industrial Revolution in the 1800s.

I would loved to have been a fly on the wall in the meeting when the new managers of al.com discussed their strategy for the future. Since newspapers put up their first Websites about 12 years ago, the Newhouse plan was never to use the Web product to help the print product. They set up separate corporations and just had the print people hand over all their content for free to the Web company, which then went about trying to figure out how to make money from the Websites like al.com and nola.com in Louisiana. If the Times-Picayne and the Birmingham News had been in control of their own Websites and had a say in what happened on them, including the revenue generated by them, they may have been able to hang on a while longer without shutting down the print operations to only three days a week.

But that does not serve the long-term Newhouse plan, you see. Clearly they are planning to bankrupt the print operations to avoid paying debt service on all the new buildings they built across the state and country back during the Bush years, never anticipating the impact the Bush Great Recession would have on their bottom lines.

I wonder what happened to those accountants who were projecting growth in print circulation and advertising revenue for the next 20 years? Did they get axed and indicted like the staff at Richard Srushy’s HealthSouth? Or did they get big bonuses and raises, like the Wall Street Bankers who engineered the Bush and Obama bailouts? Is the Newhouse chain of newspapers, Websites and TV stations an empire that is too big to fail? Let’s hope not.

We will never know, because neither the Newhouse papers, or their Web counterparts, will ever do the reporting on that. They will just run the Alabama Power ads right on the stories about Alabama Power and gin up fake controversies to drive traffic and comments to the new corporate Websites, and distract us all from an inescapable fact.

Federal environmental regulations actually provide more high paying, union jobs than they cost the economy. Ask the plumbers and pipefitters at UA Local 91 in Birmingham, Alabama, who built every one of Alabama Power’s coal-fired power plants and maintain them to this day, including installing pollution control equipment.

The same is true of the UA unions who serve the Tennessee Valley Authority’s nuclear power plants in north Alabama.

The coal miners might have a reason to fear environmentalists and new federal regulations, as well as the natural gas fracking industry, since there is a move afoot to move toward natural gas instead of coal to fire the power plants of the future. On some issues, these controversies will pit one union against another, not that you would ever find that out by reading the Newhouse papers either.

There are many environmentalists who don’t like that plan, however, but that is no reason for union workers to get all in a huff about people who care about clean air and water.

We are all going to have to work together to find solutions to serve our energy needs in ways that do not continue to damage everybody’s health. Coal miners know a lot about this. They work in it every day.

Nobody is trying to take their jobs. Some people are just trying to make their jobs a little safer and healthier for everybody, including the ones who climb down in the holes to dig the coal out of the ground.

As a nation, we should be moving beyond that old technology anyway, but those jobs are not going to disappear over night. We will still need coal for many years to come, just like we will need oil and natural gas — until alternatives are fully developed and come online. When they do, these will also be high paying jobs.

If the unions were playing it smart, they would be thinking ahead to getting in a position to unionize those workers, instead of thinking backwards trying to protect the dwindling jobs in old industries. Instead of falling for Republican rhetoric and allowing themselves to be divided away from a potentially winning political coalition, let’s all work together to create a better future.

Like the White Queen said, “It’s a poor sort of memory that only works backwards.”

The Red Queen Effect: You Can Choose Running in Place, Holding On to the Past – Or Watch the Spotlight Shining On the Future

© 2013, Glynn Wilson. All rights reserved. The Locust Fork News-Journal, LocustFork.Net

Be Sociable, Share!

Related Posts

Print

Comments

  10 comments for “Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star And Other Fairy Tales in the News

  1. January 25, 2013 at 3:55 pm

    BTW: I forgot to say the natural gas fracking industry is NOT unionized. Perhaps it should be?

  2. January 25, 2013 at 4:44 pm

    Even the Alabama Power PR guy said there is no story here.

  3. January 25, 2013 at 7:24 pm

    After talking to more of the players in this fake fight today, I can report without a shadow of a doubt that it has nothing to do with coal or “radical environmentalists.” The way this has been characterized and covered by all parties is an absolute disgrace. I would like to think that one day the people of Alabama, especially those purportedly in leadership positions, would grow up and stop falling for this nonsense.

    11/16/2012 – Mobile Gas Charges customers more than double what Biloxi utility charges

    http://blog.al.com/live/2012/11/mobile_gas_charges_customers_m.html

    12/15/2012 (ish) ENVIRONMENTAL EXTREMISTS THREATEN ALABAMA’S ECONOMY AND ABILITY TO COMPETE

    http://www.psc.alabama.gov/Cavanaugh/ENVIRONMENTAL_EXTREMISTS.pdf

    12/18/2012 – Yellow Hammer Rumors & Rumblings

    http://yellowhammerpolitics.com/blog/rumors-rumblings-31/

    12/21/2012 – Editorial: Utilities’ return rates warrant examination

    http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/article/20121223/OPINION/312210032/Editorial-Utilities-return-rates-warrant-examination

    1/4/2013 – Alabama Voices: ‘Push back’ against PSC review of utilities unjustified

    http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2013301040027

    1/9/2013 – Letters to the Editor: Review might lower utility costs

    http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2013301100004

    1/10/2013 – Utility rates: PSC rejects formal review: United Mineworkers say the request is a ‘ploy’ to end coal mining

    http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/article/20130111/NEWS02/301100037/Utility-rates-PSC-rejects-formal-review-United-Mineworkers-say-the-request-is-a-ploy-to-end-coal-mining?odyssey=tab%7Cmostpopular%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE&nclick_check=1

    1/10/2013 – Public Service Commission rejects idea of formal review of utility rates

    http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2013/01/public_service_commisison_reje.html

    1/14/2013 – Democrats Embrace Republican Public Service Commissioner Terry Dunn

    http://yellowhammerpolitics.com/blog/democrats-embrace-republican-public-service-commissioner-terry-dunn/

    1/14/2013 – Alabama Public Service Commission forgets who it works for. Or does it?

    http://blog.al.com/archiblog/2013/01/alabama_public_service_commiss.html

    1/15/2013 – Editorial: Utility rate review long overdue – PSC’s Cavanaugh, Oden do Alabamians a disservice

    http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2013301110022

    1/18/2013 – Politicians view voters as gullible

    http://decaturdaily.com/stories/Politicians%20view%20voters%20as%20gullible,111398

    1/18/2013 – Alabama Voices: Extremist groups back formal hearing call

    http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2013301180033&nclick_check=1

    1/20/2013 – Environmental groups threaten competitiveness

    http://decaturdaily.com/stories/Environmental-groups-threaten-competitiveness,111505

    1/20/2013 – Despite cheaper production costs, Alabama Power bills higher than Georgia Power

    http://blog.al.com/live/2013/01/despite_cheaper_production_cos.html

    1/20/2013 – Cavanaugh distracts voters to avoid issue

    http://decaturdaily.com/stories/Cavanaugh%20distracts%20voters%20to%20avoid%20issue,111501

    1/23/2013 – A winning strategy to dupe voters

    http://decaturdaily.com/stories/A-winning-strategy-to-dupe-voters,111695

    1/23/2013 – PSC Commission Dunn “sets record straight” about GOP-on-GOP smear

    http://blog.al.com/archiblog/2013/01/pcs_commission_dunn_sets_recor.html

    1/23/2013 – JobKeeper Alliance Says that Formal PSC Hearings Could Cost Alabama Jobs

    http://www.alreporter.com/al-politics/political-news/state-news/4082-jobkeeper-alliance-says-that-formal-psc-hearings-could-cost-alabama-jobs.html

    1/24/2013 – Alabama Power responds to AL.com article on rates comparison

    http://blog.al.com/press-register-commentary/2013/01/alabama_power_responds_to_alco.html

    1/24/2013 – Ken Hare In Depth: Utility cost issue could provide political wedge

    http://www.wsfa.com/story/20670678/ken-hare-in-depth-utility-cost-issue-could-provide-political-wedge

    1/25/2013 – Cavanaugh takes high road on commission dispute

    http://www.alreporter.com/al-politics/political-news/state-news/4093-cavanaugh-takes-high-road-on-commission-dispute.html

  4. January 25, 2013 at 7:26 pm

    This is plane and simple about Alabama Power’s rates, a historical fight they almost always win anyway. It has nothing to do with “jobs.”

  5. February 10, 2013 at 10:15 am

    According to Michael Sznajderman, one of the public relations reps for Alabama Power, these are the numbers for 2012 as far as how much coal the company used (in tons) in its coal-fired power plants.

    Only 5.3 million tons, 29%, came from Alabama coal mines, while 10.4 million tons, 57%, came from Wyoming, 2.2 million tons, 12%, came from Colombia, 96,000 tons, 1%, came from the Illinois Basin and another 207,000 tons, 1%, came from Colorado. In 2012, the company burned 18.2 million tons of coal, about 54 percent of the company’s energy mix “down significantly from a few years ago,” he said.

  6. February 10, 2013 at 10:18 am

    Even if the Public Service Commission has formal public hearings on rates in the state, the commission is controlled by Republicans, and historically, Alabama Power gets whatever it wants from the commission. In Georgia, on the other hand, they actually regulate things in that state. They charge $4 an acre in property taxes on timber land, while Alabama only charges $1 an acre. If any power plant units are closed in Alabama, it will be because of federal laws and regulations, not state regulations, and even if that were to happen, not likely, it would still not mean a loss of jobs for Alabama coal miners. Most of the coal mined in Alabama is exported, much of it to China.

    • February 13, 2013 at 8:54 pm

      It was interesting at the hearing today that some of the insiders noted that at least two of the commissioners were really putting on a snow job, but that they were regularly inserting foot in mouth. It was noted that they kept talking about having a rate hearing, but then would back off and say it was just a meeting, but then later would again mention that it was to be a hearing. I believe that Dunn may try to be the less than satisfied that will be what’s necessary to initiate a public hearing. This one is going to be fun to watch, since none of them appear to know what they are doing. But as you say, we’re talking Republicans.

      • February 13, 2013 at 8:58 pm

        I was going to attend that and livestream it, plus shoot my own video, but it seems the big issue has passed. They voted down a formal review, did they not? Guess al.com will have to find something else to drum up comments on : )

  7. February 13, 2013 at 8:56 pm

    Has anyone done a definitive comparison on the return on investment, etc rates for the southern states. We may be significantly out of line – their 9 and 10% and our 13 and up %………

  8. February 13, 2013 at 10:46 pm

    One report recently compared Georgia and Alabama only (linked in the story). It would be better to have a national comparison.

Comments are closed.