The Big Picture -
By Glynn Wilson -
It’s going to be a beautiful week for camping over the next few days, almost too nice to be indoors on the computer writing. The Google weather forecast is calling for highs in the 60s and lows in the 40s all week. We may end up in the Talladega National Forest again, or we may head for North Carolina. We’ll know more about that on Monday and keep you posted on Facebook.
If you decide to get out in the woods too, however, be careful. It is also hunting season.
But for now, it seems appropriate to comment on a few other items in the news this week. The biggest news of all was the record fine and criminal penalties levied against British oil giant BP for the largest and worst environmental disaster in history in the Gulf of Mexico in the spring of 2010.
BP and the other major oil, gas and coal companies tried their damndest to limit President Obama to one term. They pumped millions into the unaccountable third party party political groups like Karl Rove’s American Crossroads to try to get Republican Mitt Romney elected instead. His administration would have gone soft on regulating the oil companies, so who knows if this strict a judgement against BP would have been possible if the election had gone the other way?
The noise from the Gulf Coast activist community has died down quite a bit in the wake of the decision. For a year and a half the environmental activists in the Gulf region had screamed that the Obama administration was not doing enough for them, including a lot of new activists who had been ignoring politics for years and who tended to be anti-government conservatives themselves. I wonder how they feel about President Obama now?
The silence in our comment section is deafening, even on Facebook.
Fracking
But according to an AP story that hit our new RSS feeds today, there are some tough choices ahead for this administration on energy. At the top of the list is what to do about the further development of natural gas, including fracking on public lands.
There is supposed to be a so-called “public meeting” on what to do about proposed leases on 43,000 acres in Alabama, mostly in the Talladega National Forest, on Nov. 27 in Montgomery. But no one seems to have heard anything else about this since a couple of months before the election.
We may be camping in the Talladega National Forest in the next few days and getting the final footage we need for a video to go with a story on what the plans call for there, and the potential damage. We’ll keep you posted as news develops on that issue.
Alabama’s Defiance on Health Care
Meanwhile, it is becoming increasingly clear that people were wrong to trust doctor Robert Bentley to be the next governor of Alabama. While public opinion shows that the American public tends to trust medical doctors more than just about any professional group in society, Bentley continues to show he cares more about tea party politics than the people he was elected to serve.
President Obama’s reelection provided a wonderful opportunity for Bentley to show he cares enough about the peoples’ health by supporting the Affordable Care Act, which is obviously not going away now that Romney failed in his bid to become president and the Democrats picked up seats in the U.S. House and Senate in spite Republicans being in control of redrawing the district lines around the country.
Instead, Bentley pulled a Wallace-style move to shore up his Republican base and announced this past week that he would continue to defy the federal government and not expand Medicaid or set up health care exchanges to help the poor, sick citizens of Alabama.
While the press in Alabama is apparently unanimously in favor of this continued defiance, perhaps we will be the only news organization to point out something to Bentley, his followers and everybody else.
To become a politician, all Bentley had to do was swear an oath to the tea party and take the “no new taxes” pledge of Grover Norquist. To become a doctor, however, Bentley had to take the Hippocratic Oath.
In short, this is an oath doctors take to their patients and to society to be their brother’s keeper and to first “do no harm” to anyone. I guess since Bentley is a retired dermatologist, he doesn’t have to live by that oath anymore.
Let there be no mistake about this. His decision not to allow his state to participate in Obamacare will result in thousands of deaths over the next few years. And this: In spite of his reason that the state “cannot afford it,” his decision will end up costing hospitals and taxpayers more money, not less.
One of the main reasons President Obama took on health care reform in the first place — and this was totally lost in the national debate because of the tea party — was because of the drag 50 million people without health care have on the national economy. If poor, sick patients in defiant states like Alabama continue to flood emergency rooms and stiff the hospitals for the bills, that will continue to drive up health care costs for everyone else, and that includes the price of health insurance premiums.
I suspect a lot of conservative working people in Alabama wanted to trust Bentley to be governor because he sold himself as a doctor, not a politician. But now that they see he is no longer a doctor operating with the ethics of a doctor but instead is simply just another greedy politician, I doubt they will reelect him to another term.
If the Democrats could find a suitable candidate, a smart, modern, urban candidate — someone who is pro-labor and pro-environment — they might find they have a chance here in a couple of years after people see things continue to improve on the national level. Voters in Alabama approved the renewal of the Forever Wild program by a margin of 75-25 percent, after all. That should send a message.
Already, according to public opinion polls, a majority of Americans are upbeat about the next four years. As an expert on public opinion, the news media and public policy, I expect this number to continue going up over the next four years as people see responsible people running government, not yeehaws like Bentley who simply kowtow to the crazy political right.
If anybody wants to make a bet on this, I will put a case of assorted Sierra Nevada brews on the table. That reminds me. There is a little PR guy from some pharmaceutical company who owes me $1,000. He bet me that amount about a year ago at a party at the Good People brewing company that Obama would never win reelection. Now where did I put that business card?
© 2012, Glynn Wilson. All rights reserved. The Locust Fork News-Journal, LocustFork.Net











Here’s another related post:
http://blog.locustfork.net/2012/08/obamacareless-sickness-is-the-health-of-the-state/
I believe the final penalty levied against BP amounts to about one month’s take on their ledger, so this is hardly the dramatic hurt the Gulf Coast activists had hoped for. BP will roll on – one hopes a bit wiser and more safety conscious, but hardly limping. The Gulf of Mexico is priceless, and the impacts of this spill will continue to take a toll on marine and human life for years to come.
I think we’re all in a quandary – everybody agrees that an energy-independent USA is a good thing, but now we have a ‘not in my back yard’ backlash against the actual implementation of such a bold policy. I am guilty, too – no WAY I want them fracking in Talladega. It’s a poor chance, and the water poisoning and forest devastation just isn’t worth it to Alabama, imo.
If dollar bills had an oil well instead of George Washington on them, I think people would have a better idea of the centrality of energy to every other economic engine. That’s what our money really represents – x amount of energy expended.
It’s still a massive amount of money and the Obama administration ought to be credited with that. The problem I have with the settlement is that more than half the money is to go to a Republican created “conservation” foundation very few people have ever heard of and now what happens to it? I can’t seem to get any answers from the other non-profit groups around here who you would think might have an opinion on that.
Here’s an answer for you: The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation is to the environment and conservation as the National Endowment for Democracy + the International Republican Institute + the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs are to democracy.
Is that a good thing or a bad thing, LOL : )
KSF of Conservation Alabama said they do good work, but then again, they are taking credit for passage of Forever Wild even though it was the Nature Conservancy that put most of the money in for the TV ads to target rednecks who hunt and Alabama and Auburn football fans. Is that really the way to protect wild lands in Alabama? At least going after fishermen makes more sense than that, but then again, why not just appeal to peoples’ natural sense of biophilia? Oh yeah, because most people in his home state have never even heard of E.O. Wilson.
I was hoping that you, speaking on behalf of the biophiliacs, would tell me whether that’s a good or bad thing.
I honestly don’t know. I was hoping some other experts in the non-profit field would say something about it here somewhere.
If I had the budget for it, I might launch an investigation.
It is thanksgiving week, however, so that is the focus. We will be out in the woods getting more photos and video footage of the Talladega National Forest starting Wednesday. I’ve invited a few environmental activists to join us or meet us out there. So far no takers.
During a conference call this afternoon I learned that DC insiders call the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Nifwif…or so I believe I heard…at first I thought they were saying Nitwit…from various sources I’ve gathered that Nifwif will use its hefty share of the big BP pot for janitorial functions (as I term them)…cleaning up and repairing the mess left by BP…this is necessary work…but some of the damage can’t be removed or fixed…and none of Nifwif’s share of the money will go toward developing renewable, non-fossil energy…which would be the true way to keep the dangers of drilling out of the water…which would be the true way to protect the fish and wildlife.
I like it. NIFWIF. Seems to me BP has already been “cleaning up” the mess, at least on the beaches, although it just keeps coming back in on every tide with every storm. How will they replace all the life they’ve destroyed in the estuaries?