Why Do Working Class People Vote Against Their Economic Interests?

Print

Be Sociable, Share!

Poor But Proud: Twenty Years Later
Auburn History Professor Wayne Flynt Answers the Central Political Question of Our Time

by Glynn Wilson

AUBURN, Ala. — In a state where intellectuals are generally scorned as “elitists” — or as former governor and presidential candidate George Wallace liked to call them for his own opportunistic political reasons, “pointy-headed liberals” — retired Auburn History professor Wayne Flynt is one expert who is widely known around Alabama. He is someone who people seem to listen to, at least those who pay attention.

Since moving back to my home state and city a few years ago after many years of chasing a journalism career and then an academic career elsewhere, and struggling to figure out what’s wrong with this place, a key question comes up over and over again in conversation. No one seem to have a simple, satisfying answer.

Why do working class people in the South so frequently vote against their own economic self-interest?

As a historian and author, Dr. Flynt tackled this question in great detail a little more than 20 years ago in a book called Poor But Proud: Alabama’s Poor Whites.


Due to the sweep in state elections by the Republican Party in 2010, and in the wake of labor events from Wisconsin to Birmingham, I recently visited Dr. Flynt at his church, the First Baptist Church of Auburn, and conducted an interview captured on video. We talked for nearly an hour.

In answering the question a little more than 20 years after his book came out, Flynt said some things you will never see reported by any newspaper or television news station in Alabama, because economic imperatives prevent total candor with readers and viewers.

Why do poor people and the working middle class vote for Republicans who are obviously anti-worker and anti-labor and who are clearly bought and paid for by big corporations and their lobbyists?

Since World War II, and especially since the cultural wars of the 1960s, social “wedge” issues related to race and religion now play a more important role in voting habits than pragmatic economic concerns.

“It’s partly because preachers tell them that the Democratic Party is a godless party,” Flynt said. “It’s party because the Democratic Party is made up of a large number of African-Americans, and working class whites just won’t vote that way.”

If you go back and take a look at the history before the 1960s, Dr. Flynt said, you won’t find much discussion in families of such social wedge issues as birth control, abortion, prayer in the schools, obscenity in the media, gay rights, etc.

“Now what you get, after the 1960s, is the promotion of (social-wedge issues) as an alternative agenda,” Dr. Flynt said. “That is one of the major things that divided the labor movement. Now you don’t just have ethnicity and race. You have all these culture war issues that make it even more difficult to bring workers together, just on behalf of the quality of life that they’re going to have and their kids are going to have. They are not going to be much affected by these other issues.”

After the culture wars of the ’60s, Dr. Flynt said, “Unfortunately, there is a division, not along class lines, which had been the case before.”

But even in churches, he said, people are “polarized,” not around theology. “They are being polarized by culture war issues.”

So people like former Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore, a.k.a. the “Ten Commandments Judge,” who is now talking about running for president even though he can’t even win a Republican primary for governor in Alabama, argue that the “real issue” is abortion, and the solution is posting the Ten Commandments in public places such as courts and schools. As if, Dr. Flynt said with a wry smile, “suddenly, everything is going to be good in America. All our problems are going to be solved. There will be no more illegitimacy, no more divorce, everything’s going to be fine.”

“Well, obviously, posting the Ten Commandments is not going to make that happen,” Dr. Flynt said. “Prayer in the public schools is not going to make that happen.”

Dr. Flynt, a Baptist who understands the history of that protestant denomination’s role in promoting an American principle calling for a separation of church and state, puts the issue simply.

“If you are a truck diver, a plumber, an electrician or a steel worker and you live in Alabama, you say, ‘Well, I think my religion is the way everybody ought to think,” Dr. Flynt said. But, “let that same guy move to Salt Lake City, Utah (where the majority is Mormon) or New Jersey or Connecticut (where the majority is Catholic) or Dearborn, Michigan, (where the majority is Muslim), and he won’t think so highly of the idea that the majority of people ought to impose their religious values on the minority.”

Dr. Flynt says the political problem working people face is what he calls “hard support” for Republican and conservative politics, “from an awful lot of traditional power elites and lobbyist groups in Alabama (like ALFA, the old Farmers Bureau, now an insurance company), and individual voters.

“They don’t want to pay taxes. They don’t care about public schools,” he said. “They particularly don’t want to pay for black kids in public schools. They are not going to subsidize schools in Birmingham, Huntsville, Montgomery and Mobile, in the inner-city. And they are certainly not going to support schools in the Black Belt, where virtually all the kids are black.”

“Well, this is absolutely suicidal,” Dr. Flynt said. “Because white people are not having children. People of color are having children.”

Already, he said, 54 percent of the kids in public schools are on programs for free and reduced-priced meals. By about the year 2017, a majority of kids in public schools will be children of color. Nationally, they already are: US Census Shows Whites No Longer Have Majority of Babies.

“If you don’t educate them you’ve got no future in this state,” Dr. Flynt said. “You might as well move to Connecticut or Washington State or somewhere else. There is no future in the global economy for Alabama if you are not going to support the schools.”

Another part of the problem is what Dr. Flynt calls, “soft support” for Republican policies, generally from people who don’t like taxes of any kind, especially personal income taxes and corporate taxes. “They don’t like government,” he acknowledges.

While those in the extractive industries such as timber and mining want, especially in South Alabama, are not the same, however, as what more modern corporate leaders in North Alabama want. It doesn’t take much of an education to be a pulp wood worker or a coal miner, Flynt said. But for the modern auto factory manager, who needs skilled workers to run computerized robotics, they want “policy change,” including more accountability in education and better schools.

Dr. Flynt is not just an arms-length academic social scientist. Since he retired, he also calls himself an activist, and mostly gets involved in working with faith-based groups that aid the poor. He has been quoted as saying we cannot wait for top-down leadership to solve our problems. Solutions must come from the grass-roots up.

“If you wait for leadership groups to solve your problems, you will wait ’till hell freezes over,” he said. “We’ve just seen by what happened in Wisconsin what the real agenda is: To make the United States like Alabama was in the middle of the 19th century.”

People in Wisconsin were even talking about the so-called “Southern policy” toward economic development. “Of course above all else it is anti-union,” he said. Basically it means: “Keep unions out (and) stop regulation of business.”

He said people tend to support state-funded incentives to use tax money to recruit industry, companies that will be exempt from paying taxes for 30 years, even though that means “they will not be supporting the kind of infrastructure you need to build a modern state.”

“To me,” he said, “if that is the proper strategy for Wisconsin to follow, you would have thought that in 100 years, Alabama would be way, way beyond where Wisconsin is right now. If that’s the most appropriate strategy, why aren’t we the most prosperous, best educated place in America? Because Lord knows, we pursued that strategy longer and harder than any other region in the United States.”

One of the problems that results from decades of conservative voting by poor people and the working middle class is a corruption of the court system, which now slants in favor of corporations even at the highest level, the United States Supreme Court, because Republican presidents appoint conservative judges. In last year’s ruling in Citizens United vs. the FEC, the court reversed 100 years of American law. There have been limits on corporate contributions for that long, but not anymore. The high court removed those limits on First Amendment free speech grounds, but also talked about the role of unions in countering corporate influence on politics and government.

What that decision did, Dr. Flynt acknowledged, “was to load the political culture of the United States aganist working class people, because corporations have huge amounts of money and their leadership just decide how it’s going to be spent.”

“Unions,” on the other hand, he said, “have small and declining amounts of money to invest in politics, and they are going to be simply overwhelmed by what happens.”

After researching this history and watching the politics go bad over the years, does Dr. Flynt have some hope for turning things around in the future?

“I do,” he says. “At the heart of it is education.”

“Unions are going to have to educate their members better,” he said. “They are going to have to say, ‘We respect your religious views, we respect your cultural views. There are an awful lot of union leaders who agree with you.

“But that’s not going to help us very much in terms of keeping your job … or making sure your son can follow you into this profession. We are going to have to work on a separate set of issues that are about politics and economics,” he said. “And we are going to have to let these other issues be sorted out in other places besides American politics’.”

“If we don’t,” he said, “you may elect people who really agree with you on these culture war issues, but they’re not going to agree with you in terms of the quality of your life or your work.”

Dr. Flynt also has some hope for the next election cycle.

“I think you are going to see a lot of elections turn around in 2012 in places like Wisconsin and Ohio, where finally, apathetic voters discover that all those battles that were so painfully won by your mother and father, your grandmother and grandfather, are going to be taken away if you just apathetically sit there on your rear-end and don’t get out and register and vote. If you don’t get out there and organize, it’s going to be gone.”

He said the same thing is happening with younger African-American voters, who are beginning to understand that just because their forefathers like Martin Luther King Jr. won those battles for civil rights doesn’t mean they will stay won.

“Assuming that because these battles were won once, we don’t ever have to do anything more,” he said, “well that’s a fatal mistake.”

Part of the problem, too, Flynt acknowledges, is the national and local media in Alabama and other Southern states, where organized labor and the plight of workers is never given a fair shake, in spite of all the generalized claims by the press of being “objective” or “fair and balanced.”

“It has been a very long time since you read anything in any media, print media, that basically treats labor fairly or favorably,” Dr. Flynt said.

“It’s not that I think labor is always right. I don’t. I think labor is sometimes totally wrong,” he said. “But I’d just like to read somebody who tells me what I consider to be a fair and balanced view of a labor position on something, and you simply don’t get that in the national media or the local media. Especially you don’t get it in the local media,” he said, laughing.

That’s been the case since the 1880s, he said.

Even though he is a bit old fashioned in the way he works and does not participate in social networking on Facebook and such, he acknowledges that part of the solution is building an alternative media online.

“Advertisers in the Birmingham paper, the Mobile paper and the Huntsville paper aren’t interested in covering working class union issues,” he said with a smile. “Nor do they cover international issues. It’s very parochial.”

So, he said: “What labor’s going to have to do is find a way to communicate with their members who are interested in the economic issues and the future of their jobs, and their kids’ jobs, and using that media in order to educate themselves, educate their members, tell their members, ‘Hey! Have you watched this? Cause you really need to watch this. Because this is where you’re going to learn an awful lot of stuff … about regulations, about jobs and about the future.

“And if you don’t watch this,” he said, “you are not going to have a very good life for very long.”

Retired Auburn History Professor Wayne Flynt (see video above)

Wayne Flynt is Professor Emeritus in the Department of History at Auburn University. He has won numerous teaching awards and been a Distinguished University Professor for many years. His research focuses on Southern culture, Alabama politics, Southern religion, education reform, and poverty. He is Editor-in-Chief of the Online Encyclopedia of Alabama.

Glynn Wilson is a veteran investigative reporter, freelance writer and Web Publisher whose work has appeared in The Nation, The New York Times, The Christian Science Monitor and many other newspapers and magazines, including some of the best alternative weeklies in the country. Wilson is now spending most of his time building the alternative, independent, Watchdog Web Press. That includes building the economy to support it.

Support An Alternative Independent Web Press: And reach a high-end, influential audience too

Practicing this kind of journalism requires resources. If you like what you see, and grasp that this is better than what you will ever get in the mainstream media, considering making a personal contribution today.




© 2011, Glynn Wilson. All rights reserved. The Locust Fork News-Journal, LocustFork.Net

Be Sociable, Share!

Related Posts

  • Poor But Proud: Twenty Years LaterJune 22, 2011 -- Poor But Proud: Twenty Years Later (2)
    Auburn Professor Wayne Flynt Answers the Central Political Question of Our Time

    Locust Fork News-Journal Editor and Publisher Glynn Wilson interviews retired Auburn Professor Wayne Flynt on...

  • The Revolution Will Not Be Televised: But There Will Be VideoApril 29, 2013 -- The Revolution Will Not Be Televised: But There Will Be Video (0)
    "…I've seen the promised land. I may not get there with you, but I want you to know … that we as a people will get to the promised land. So I'm happy tonight. I'm not worried about anything. I'm no...
  • Al Henley Elected President of the AFL-CIO of Alabama October 28, 2011 -- Al Henley Elected President of the AFL-CIO of Alabama (0)

    Al Henley of Montgomery was elected president of the AFL-CIO of Alabama this week. In this exclusive interview with The Locust Fork News-Journal, he talks about the state convention, what organ...

Print

Comments

  15 comments for “Why Do Working Class People Vote Against Their Economic Interests?

  1. June 25, 2011 at 11:23 am

    Excellent interview with Professor Flint. I wish every citizen of the Sourth with a family income under $350,000 would study this interview and all of these points. But if every adult in a family with less than $100,000 would heed these points, we may have a middle class that retuns with vigor.

    Thanks for posting it. I am glad the wait is over : )

  2. Nichelle Mitchem
    June 26, 2011 at 10:20 am

    Thank you for the post. It is very informative.

    I have often wondered why poor people did not vote in their economic interest particularly in the South e.g. Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, etc. I had beliefs about the reasons underlying what appeared to be an absolutely irrational act from an economic, social, and political perspective. The interview confirmed by assertions. It was an excellent interview with Professor Flynt. I found a new book and weblog to read.

    I look forward to reading Dr. Flynts’ book. Again, Great interview and timely subject given the past election results. It is my hope that the spirit of Madison will sweep the country and workers levels of political and economic consciousness as well as commitment to collective has been raised.

  3. Yolanda McLain
    June 26, 2011 at 10:41 am

    A great interview with Dr. Flynt, a state treasure. His talks on the proud poor and the factors that shaped Alabama politics and the 1901 Constitution should be heard by all citizens of Alabama, high and low income. Unless we know our history, we cannot understand ourselves or each other.

  4. June 26, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    Great article. I’ve always wondered how people could vote against their own self interest, it’s anathema. I do hope people start to sit up and take notice. Hopefully it won’t get much worse before it gets better.
    Thank you.

  5. June 26, 2011 at 10:26 pm

    Keep up the good fight. I fought for this Nation in Vietnam when the call was made in the 1960′s. Last year, I fought again for this Nation in precisely what you identified in this article, when I ran against Richard Shelby, for his Alabama seat in the United States Senate. I ran a “People’s Campaign” because it was for the working people of Alabama; not corporations, or the wealthy.

    It is my hope and desire to see the working class people of Alabama rise to the occassion in 2012 and vote for the party that will represent “the working class” after the national election. Our children and our children’s children are depending on us.

  6. Yana Davis
    June 27, 2011 at 9:26 am

    Despite Mr. Barnes’s optimism, I doubt that the electorate will suddenly have a Road to Damascus experience and vote completely differently than in the past.

    That sort of change in electoral politics would reflect a major shift, among a significant number of people, in cultural and social values. That change is, in fact, underway not just in Alabama but the US and throughout the world, but its an incremental, long process.

    Major catastrophes and calamities — the Great Depression, for instance — can speed up paradigm shifts. Usually, however, a paradigm shift of this magnitude requires more than one generation from the time the new values become commonly known.

    And that is certainly not a call to be quiet or stop pointing out naked emperors wherever they appear. The work Glynn does here at Locust Fork, for instance, is extremely vital in keeping people informed of views that do not comport with establishment propaganda.

    When many politicians of the calibre of Barack Obama suddenly begin getting elected to office, that will be sign that the paradigm shift has reached critical mass.

  7. mary calvanee
    June 27, 2011 at 9:27 am

    Recently C-Span ran the Literary Readings from the FDR Library in Hyde Park, an annual event. In the Q&A session, this very question was asked, why do poor people vote for Republicans back in the ’30′s and now? Not one person could answer the question. Finally a brilliant interview that discusses the reality of why the working class has voted poor in the past 30 to 40 years. I too now have a new book to read and a new blog to watch.

  8. G Kanzler
    June 27, 2011 at 1:55 pm

    Hallelujah! Finally- the answer to a question that’s been gnawing at me since I first started following politics. Thanks for your insightful interview.

    This needs to be spread far and wide and maybe we can reverse this ‘death spiral’ that the country is going into…

  9. June 27, 2011 at 10:47 pm

    It was a pleasure to finally get this story and video out after thinking about it for so long.

    Judging by the reaction of some of the rank and file, however, it is going down like a bitter pill — hard to swallow.

    Shakespeare said something about that, but I am too relaxed tonight to go further than a cursory Google search to find it.

    Or, we could really pull some strings and reach for the Bible. “For those who have an ear let them hear…”

  10. K McCoy
    June 28, 2011 at 11:56 am

    If you do not read the newspaper you are uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you are misinformed.

  11. David Underhill
    July 2, 2011 at 7:53 pm

    Canny interviewing.

    Crafty video/audio editing.

    Flynt calls the region’s standard political and economic practices suicidal–offering human and material resources cheap, handing out corporate welfare in the form of tax breaks and other gifts, which starves public services like infrastructure and schools, which cripples the chances of competing and prospering in a globo-techno economy.

    Who is this suicidal for? Not for those who receive the resulting skimpy educations and beggared jobs. They may be victims, but not of suicide. Nor is it suicidal for those who broker these arrangements, usually with corporate titans headquatered elsewhere. The locals complicit in such deals are very finely rewarded for making their neighbors across town and territory down the road available for use by partners from afar. This isn’t suicidal–for them. It’s beneficial–for them.

    Even when the partner is somebody like BP who pukes all over you, the mess lands mostly on those who didn’t arrange the deal. And after the worst is over, the local arrangers will have escaped most of the mess and may even emerge clutching new opportunities and advantages. Where is the suicide?

  12. July 2, 2011 at 11:55 pm

    Economic suicide. There will be no jobs in the future for the uneducated. No tax revenue to pave roads, fix bridges, build and maintain schools, pay Social security benefits, Medicare or Medicaid.

    You can’t run a third-world economy in a developed society forever.

    Like Daryl Dewberry said at the big union rally in Birmingham: “They will have us eating fish heads and rice like the Chinese if we don’t stand up and fight for our rights now.”

    http://blog.locustfork.net/2011/04/alabama-miners-shut-down-coal-production-rally-for-labor-in-birmingham/

  13. David Underhill
    July 3, 2011 at 2:47 pm

    The ones who will have no jobs or decent education, roads, social security etc are not those who brought these things about…they have not committed suicide…they have been sacrificed…nor are the local arrangers of these deals suicidal…they benefit, along with their distant partners.

  14. July 3, 2011 at 3:30 pm

    They did help bring them about, if they voted Republican.

    As for those who benefitted in the short-term, they will not benefit in the long-term — if the state goes to hell in a hand basket.

  15. Paros
    July 3, 2011 at 9:52 pm

    Wayne Flynt is the voice of freedom and sanity speaking from the bowels of Alabama. His words ring with a truth that is recognized by its clarity.

    I am overjoyed on this Independence Day to have found this excellent source of news. What took me so long?

Comments are closed.