﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alabama Reps Score Red on Green Report Card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.locustfork.net/2010/02/alabama-reps-score-red-on-green-report-card/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2010/02/alabama-reps-score-red-on-green-report-card/</link>
	<description>A Wide Open Weblog for Big News, the Big Picture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:15:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glynn Wilson</title>
		<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2010/02/alabama-reps-score-red-on-green-report-card/comment-page-1/#comment-3959</link>
		<dc:creator>Glynn Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.locustfork.net/?p=6350#comment-3959</guid>
		<description>Not sure what all the technical issues are, but could probably help you figure it out as a stats expert.

On the other hand, a quantitative measure based simply on voting doesn&#039;t catch other nuances. It is quite clear, for example, that Davis is no environmentalist, in spite of his score in this report.

There&#039;s no way he deserves a B, but then, he would never tell anyone about getting a B on a conservation report card, since his entire campaign is clearly focused on being seen as he has said in his own words, &quot;One of the most conservative Democrats in the House.&quot;

He is after big business support, not voters who care about the environment.

I suspect he would be scared to death his opponent would get hold of this and use it against him in TV ads...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what all the technical issues are, but could probably help you figure it out as a stats expert.</p>
<p>On the other hand, a quantitative measure based simply on voting doesn&#8217;t catch other nuances. It is quite clear, for example, that Davis is no environmentalist, in spite of his score in this report.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no way he deserves a B, but then, he would never tell anyone about getting a B on a conservation report card, since his entire campaign is clearly focused on being seen as he has said in his own words, &#8220;One of the most conservative Democrats in the House.&#8221;</p>
<p>He is after big business support, not voters who care about the environment.</p>
<p>I suspect he would be scared to death his opponent would get hold of this and use it against him in TV ads&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConservationAL</title>
		<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2010/02/alabama-reps-score-red-on-green-report-card/comment-page-1/#comment-3958</link>
		<dc:creator>ConservationAL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 04:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.locustfork.net/?p=6350#comment-3958</guid>
		<description>A state version is not as easy as it sounds, primarily because most environmental bills get stuck in committee, making it difficult to assess all equally. There&#039;s also the quirkiness of the BIR - budget isolation resolution - which, if defeated, means a bill doesn&#039;t come up for consideration. Can you say a legislator voted against a bill when they voted against the BIR? An argument could be made either way.

Nonetheless, a scorecard for the state is coming, but more likely in 2011.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A state version is not as easy as it sounds, primarily because most environmental bills get stuck in committee, making it difficult to assess all equally. There&#8217;s also the quirkiness of the BIR &#8211; budget isolation resolution &#8211; which, if defeated, means a bill doesn&#8217;t come up for consideration. Can you say a legislator voted against a bill when they voted against the BIR? An argument could be made either way.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, a scorecard for the state is coming, but more likely in 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glynn Wilson</title>
		<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2010/02/alabama-reps-score-red-on-green-report-card/comment-page-1/#comment-3957</link>
		<dc:creator>Glynn Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.locustfork.net/?p=6350#comment-3957</guid>
		<description>Guess they have decent Senators, unlike Alabama. This is only the U.S. Senate map.

What is needed is a state version of this for candidates for governor, attorney general, etc., as well as the Legislature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess they have decent Senators, unlike Alabama. This is only the U.S. Senate map.</p>
<p>What is needed is a state version of this for candidates for governor, attorney general, etc., as well as the Legislature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yana Davis</title>
		<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2010/02/alabama-reps-score-red-on-green-report-card/comment-page-1/#comment-3956</link>
		<dc:creator>Yana Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.locustfork.net/?p=6350#comment-3956</guid>
		<description>No surprise about Alabama.

It is a little surprising to see Arkansas and Virginia with the same shade of green as California, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No surprise about Alabama.</p>
<p>It is a little surprising to see Arkansas and Virginia with the same shade of green as California, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

