﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pat Buchanan Dons White Sheet, Blasts Sotomayor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.locustfork.net/2009/07/pat-buchanan-dons-white-sheet-blasts-sotomayor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2009/07/pat-buchanan-dons-white-sheet-blasts-sotomayor/</link>
	<description>A Wide Open Weblog for Big News, the Big Picture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:44:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yana Davis</title>
		<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2009/07/pat-buchanan-dons-white-sheet-blasts-sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-3140</link>
		<dc:creator>Yana Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.locustfork.net/2009/07/17/pat-buchanan-dons-white-sheet-blasts-sotomayor/#comment-3140</guid>
		<description>Saw part of this last night and was stunned. Even for Buchanan, this was an astonishing display.

Where is Buchanan coming from? He is not coming from the old, semi-libertarian right represented by folks like Robert Taft.

Rather, Buchanan hails from the ethnocentric, populist-nationalist point on the political grid. There were a number of Democrats who fit into that category in the early and mid 20th century, including George Wallace, but the nat-pops can now be found almost exclusively in the Republican Party.

They have redefined themselves as &quot;neo-conservatives,&quot; starting with former Marxist Irving Kristol and his son Bill Kristol, and thereby destroyed whatever credence and respect the term &quot;conservative&quot; may once have enjoyed.

Now to the 24,000 dollar question: why is MSNBC, or anyone else, continuing to provide people with Buchanan&#039;s views a venue? I would expect Fox to do that, but I would hope in the future that MSNBC and CNN could do better.

Time for Pat to retire, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw part of this last night and was stunned. Even for Buchanan, this was an astonishing display.</p>
<p>Where is Buchanan coming from? He is not coming from the old, semi-libertarian right represented by folks like Robert Taft.</p>
<p>Rather, Buchanan hails from the ethnocentric, populist-nationalist point on the political grid. There were a number of Democrats who fit into that category in the early and mid 20th century, including George Wallace, but the nat-pops can now be found almost exclusively in the Republican Party.</p>
<p>They have redefined themselves as &#8220;neo-conservatives,&#8221; starting with former Marxist Irving Kristol and his son Bill Kristol, and thereby destroyed whatever credence and respect the term &#8220;conservative&#8221; may once have enjoyed.</p>
<p>Now to the 24,000 dollar question: why is MSNBC, or anyone else, continuing to provide people with Buchanan&#8217;s views a venue? I would expect Fox to do that, but I would hope in the future that MSNBC and CNN could do better.</p>
<p>Time for Pat to retire, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

