<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Political Gamesmanship on the Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.locustfork.net/2009/06/more-political-gamesmanship-on-the-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2009/06/more-political-gamesmanship-on-the-supreme-court/</link>
	<description>A Wide Open Weblog for Big News, the Big Picture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:37:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.M.</title>
		<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2009/06/more-political-gamesmanship-on-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-3010</link>
		<dc:creator>E.M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.locustfork.net/?p=3946#comment-3010</guid>
		<description>Leura Garrett Canary should be disbarred.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leura Garrett Canary should be disbarred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glynn Wilson</title>
		<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2009/06/more-political-gamesmanship-on-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-3009</link>
		<dc:creator>Glynn Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.locustfork.net/?p=3946#comment-3009</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s break a little news anonymous Doc style:

Sources say Davis has given Sessions veto power over judicial nominees in Alabama, and we all know how important that Middle District federal courthouse is to the intel/military industrial complex in Alabama — and the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s break a little news anonymous Doc style:</p>
<p>Sources say Davis has given Sessions veto power over judicial nominees in Alabama, and we all know how important that Middle District federal courthouse is to the intel/military industrial complex in Alabama — and the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yana Davis</title>
		<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2009/06/more-political-gamesmanship-on-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-3008</link>
		<dc:creator>Yana Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.locustfork.net/?p=3946#comment-3008</guid>
		<description>Politics are and always have been full of deals. One of the few non-dealing politicians to make it to the White House,

Jimmy Carter, discovered the hard way that being 100% upright and ethical gets you hated by congressional leaders of your own party, few if any major initiatives passed, and increased lethargy on the part of leading civil service bureaucrats.

The starry-eyed idealists who were swooning about the coming of the Age of Aquarius just after Obama&#039;s election ignored two centuries of tawdry deal making that is the hallmark of DC politics.

While Obama is a huge improvement on his predecessor, it will serve us all to remember that hardly any other players in the Babylon-by-the-Potomac soap opera went away. They may have new roles -- e.g., Hillary as Secretary of State. etc. -- but they are 99.9% the same merry band of players who&#039;ve been around for years. And as for the civil service bureaucrats who actually run most executive agencies, many if them have been around since Carter or Reagan.

Keeping Canary on as U.S. Attorney, given factors cited, is an outcome that should only be mildly surprising. Every president is faced with trading horses to get what&#039;s desired. If Obama&#039;s senior aides think this horse trade is worth it, they&#039;ll do it. It&#039;s part and parcel of DC culture and politics.

Are things better, and will they get even better, with Obama in the White House? Certainly. But things will not be perfect and change will be incremental.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politics are and always have been full of deals. One of the few non-dealing politicians to make it to the White House,</p>
<p>Jimmy Carter, discovered the hard way that being 100% upright and ethical gets you hated by congressional leaders of your own party, few if any major initiatives passed, and increased lethargy on the part of leading civil service bureaucrats.</p>
<p>The starry-eyed idealists who were swooning about the coming of the Age of Aquarius just after Obama&#8217;s election ignored two centuries of tawdry deal making that is the hallmark of DC politics.</p>
<p>While Obama is a huge improvement on his predecessor, it will serve us all to remember that hardly any other players in the Babylon-by-the-Potomac soap opera went away. They may have new roles &#8212; e.g., Hillary as Secretary of State. etc. &#8212; but they are 99.9% the same merry band of players who&#8217;ve been around for years. And as for the civil service bureaucrats who actually run most executive agencies, many if them have been around since Carter or Reagan.</p>
<p>Keeping Canary on as U.S. Attorney, given factors cited, is an outcome that should only be mildly surprising. Every president is faced with trading horses to get what&#8217;s desired. If Obama&#8217;s senior aides think this horse trade is worth it, they&#8217;ll do it. It&#8217;s part and parcel of DC culture and politics.</p>
<p>Are things better, and will they get even better, with Obama in the White House? Certainly. But things will not be perfect and change will be incremental.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ivan swift</title>
		<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2009/06/more-political-gamesmanship-on-the-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-3007</link>
		<dc:creator>ivan swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.locustfork.net/?p=3946#comment-3007</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s incomprehensible to me how the obama administration could justify keeping leura canary on as us atty. i know obama is not worried about our electoral votes in 2012 -- bama ed level wont rise enough to go democratic. but it would make him a national joke -- something even worse for a pol than going all the way to argentina to get laid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s incomprehensible to me how the obama administration could justify keeping leura canary on as us atty. i know obama is not worried about our electoral votes in 2012 &#8212; bama ed level wont rise enough to go democratic. but it would make him a national joke &#8212; something even worse for a pol than going all the way to argentina to get laid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

