Smoking Guns in the Bushes of Justice

February 6th, 2009

by Glynn Wilson

We have known all along that the smoking gun was hiding somewhere, nestled down in between the cracks of all the ongoing probes of the Bush Justice Department. In fact we have known that there are way more than one smoking gun hiding in the bushes behind the misdeeds of George W. Bush’s White House — and that Karl Rove’s fingerprints are, without a doubt, all over them.

There are a few more smoking guns to chase down before we are through, all of us dedicated to disclosing the worst crimes of the Bush administration, that is, before the cowboys all ride into the sunset back to Texas.

There are still e-mail servers to chase and hidden documents to go after, material no one’s even thought to stick their noses into, yet.

But if you look closely at a couple of largely ignored reports from two of the hardest working investigative reporters digging into these stories, one of the smoking guns is right in front of our faces.

Jason Leopold with his fairly new investigative reporting site The Public Record has unearthed one of the guns, while Wayne Madsen on his proprietary Wayne Madsen Report is handling the smoke (no link available).

Leopold is now reporting that the chief of staff to former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Kyle Sampson, has been cooperating with special prosecutor Nora Dannehy by providing “damaging information” on meetings and conversations between Gonzalez and former Bush political adviser Karl Rove showing direct political involvement in the decisions to fire U.S. attorneys around the country.

Sampson is said to have provided Dannehy with an important piece of evidence that bolstered her case against Gonzales: the former Attorney General was aware of and helped create a list of federal prosecutors to fire.

The list is the gun.

Gonzales testified under oath before Congress in April 2007 that he played no role in creating such a list, telling Jeff Sessions, Alabama’s junior Republican senator:

“I have searched my memory. I have no recollection of the meeting…. I don’t remember the contents of this meeting.”

But according to multiple legal sources, Leopold writes:

Sampson is said to have told Dannehy that Gonzales met regularly with White House officials in the Office of Political Affairs, headed by George W. Bush’s former senior adviser Karl Rove, about the identities of the federal prosecutors that should be placed on the list and subsequently fired.

If that turns out to be true, then it’s enough of a smoking gun to bring both Gonzalez and Rove up on charges of a criminal conspiracy. Although there are indications Ms. Dannehy is looking for a way to let them off the hook by dancing around the issue of a direct “intent” to commit a crime, and on whether the firings were indeed specifically intended to thwart public corruption cases.

Before we get to the motivation for why Ms. Dannehy might not want to pursue criminal charges against anybody from the Bush White house, there’s more.


Leopold reports:

Documents released by the Justice Department showed that Gonzales and McNulty participated in an hour-long meeting with Sampson and three other officials on Nov. 27, 2006 – about two weeks before the U.S. Attorneys were fired – to review the plan to fire them…

Sampson is said to have told Dannehy that Gonzales met regularly with White House officials in the Office of Political Affairs, headed by George W. Bush’s former senior adviser Karl Rove, about the identities of the federal prosecutors that should be placed on the list and subsequently fired.

Both Rove and Gonzalez were mysteriously let go from the service of the Bush White House in August 2007, right around the time all of these political justice cases started coming to light, just three months after the biggest piece of evidence surfaced indicating the prosecution of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman was indeed politically motivated. That would be the affidavit of North Alabama attorney and GOP whistle-blower Jill Simpson. No one really knows yet which of the smoking guns convinced Bush to let them go after he vowed to stick by them both. That’s one of the things we need to find out.

Bush later advised all of his former staffers to ignore any and all congressional subpoenas on the grounds of “executive privilege,” a power asserted by former presidents when it comes to conversations with aides. Bush has even asserted in legal documents and in televised interviews that this “privilege,” akin to attorney-client privilege, extends beyond his presidency.

As we reported just the other day, there is an interesting dance going on between Rove and his “liberal” lawyer Bob Luskin on whether Rove will cooperate with any of these investigations, and on whether he is asserting “executive privilege” or not. The dance seems to be designed to confuse the issue and run down the statute of limitations clock.

According to Madsen’s reporting showing where some of the smoke seems intended to hide the gun, Ms. Dannehy has a series of major conflicts of interest in the case that include family connections not unlike those of U.S. attorney Laure Canary, who brought the charges against Siegelman just in time to taint his run for governor in 2006. Her husband, Bill Canary, has worked with Rove and the Bush family in the past, a fact that we have reported over and over again for the past year and a half — yet still seems to be lost on every Newhouse and Gannet newspaper in Alabama, even though it has also been pointed out on the front page and the editorial page of the New York Times and in the pages of Time magazine. It’s been on CBS’s “60 Minutes” and MSNBC too.

But what Madsen is reporting is new. He says Ms. Dannehy’s background reveals that she too is “nothing more than a long-time GOP hack for Bush family interests.”

Leopold says she is on the verge of delivering a briefing on the case to President Barrack Obama’s new Attorney General Eric Holder.

There are confidential communications flying over the Internets as we type this to try and make sure she does not get away with blowing smoke up his ass, without delivering the gun to go along with it.

If this smoking gun doesn’t do the trick and result in a full-scale criminal probe to get Karl Rove off the streets, we’ll just have to keep digging around in those other bushes until we find the right one.

Like The Boss said, “There’s always something…”

Sorry, there are no polls available at the moment.

Tags: , , , , , ,

No Responses to “Smoking Guns in the Bushes of Justice”

  1. jim gundlach Says:

    Remember that Gonzales said he had no memory of this meeting. Saying “I don’t remember” is not a denial, it is a statement that cannot be prosecuted for perjury because there is no way to prove what he remembered at the time. But, all the Republican propaganda organs, aka Alabama press, treated it as a denial and treated it as more credible than Jill Simpson’s sworn statement.

  2. Glynn Wilson Says:

    What we came to call a “non-denial, denial.” A Ronald Reagan Alzheimer’s response.

  3. admin Says:

    This just in from Don Siegelman via gmail:

    If it is true that DOJ is now trying to discredit Jill Simpson to clear Rove this is so un-American it’s got to be stopped.

    DS

  4. Yana Davis Says:

    My question is why the DOJ is still behaving as they did when Bush was president. When does the new US district attorney take office, or is Canary still in office for the time being?

  5. Glynn Wilson Says:

    Eric Holder was just sworn in. We don’t know yet what changes are going to be made in Alabama, but you can bet we’ll report on it here as soon as we know something. Stay tuned…

  6. admin Says:

    From Roger Shuler via e-mail:

    The Bush Justice Department was supposed to be investigating U.S. Attorneys Alice Martin and Leura Canary for their roles in possible political prosecutions, including the Don Siegelman case. But government resources are being unlawfully used to investigate Alabama whistleblower Jill Simpson:

    Rove Leading Harassment Campaign Against Jill Simpson

  7. admin Says:

    From Pam’s List:

    If this is true and he leaves Don hanging, then he’ll not get my vote or support, that’s for sure.

    A. Pride

  8. admin Says:

    From Pam’s List:

    Davis (he doesn’t deserve the title Rep.) is a boot licker and a yes man. He is playing both sides of the fence. Whatever Riley wants he will help. Someone should warn President Obama.

    Jan in Decatur

  9. admin Says:

    From Pam’s List:

    John Dean’s good analysis of Karl Rove’s manipulations.

    Bottom line: Arrest that sucker for contempt.

    Karl Rove Is Betting He Can Avoid Publicly Disclosing His Role In the Bush Administration’s Firing Of Independent-Minded U. S. Attorneys—But He May Be Wrong

  10. JL Strickland Says:

    I am a doddering old man now.

    I pray the Good Lord will let me live long enough to see Karl Rove behind bars. Preferably in Don Siegelman’s old cell. Then He can take me home to Cheaha.

    That’s all I ask. Is that too much to wish for?

    I hope not. We lock up more criminals than any industrialized country on the planet. One more shouldn’t make a lick of difference.

  11. Glynn Wilson Says:

    Karl Rove is a special kind of criminal, who worked for another American president who believed he was above the law.

    Lawyers mostly get this — except for some in Alabama who fear a full-scale Rove investigation — along with a certain member of Congress who wants to be governor. Is Davis’s friend Bill Canary talking to his old buddy Karl Rove? Is Rove in fact behind the numbers Davis is using to say he can win the Democratic primary?

    Interesting side commentary via phone today, including news of more layoffs in the Huntsville TV market. The corporate bastards are continuing to consolidate the wealth, while the lawyers get high and sleep.

    The death of the press is also one of Bush’s mandates, and he’s about to accomplish it as he cuts brush in Texas. Thank you Karl Rove for destroying America. That is your legacy project Turd Blossom. We hope someone creates on online cartoon character of you. Your powers come from deep under the slime beneath the sea, like oil itself.

    Your character name should be Oil Man, the cartoon anti-hero who finally vanquishes Superman, the newspaper photographer who stood for “truth, justice and the American way.”

    Ah, but you never know. Perhaps Superman lives. He just needs a little help from his attorney comrades for the tools to climb out from under the pile of Kryptonite.

  12. JL Strickland Says:

    I realize this is not strictly following this thread, but am I the only person who feels that Mark Fuller should not have been allowed to sit in judgment of Don Siegelman, considering their previous animosity toward each other.

    I am not saying that this amounted to a kangeroo court, but I heard that during the proceedings, Judge Fuller spoke with an Australian accent.

  13. Glynn Wilson Says:

    You are not alone…

  14. anon Says:

    About Ms. Dannehy,

    Well, I can’t imagine where we are supposed to start. First of all, anyone who comes back from New Mexico, which was her Iglesias leg of the investigation, claiming not to be able to tease the facts out of the Land of Enchantment, simply is no investigator.

    She also doesn’t exactly know how to think.

    But I am not worried about Iglesias et al as much as I am about the far more vulnerable and anonymous victims of injustice who are depending on her far more, and whom she won’t help in her home state of Connecticut, where she is the acting US Attorney.

    She has out of her own mediocrity and neglect allowed victims’ to slip down a sewer for her inability to act and the press here either praises her or ignores her. She can barely bandle more than a drug or gun case.

    Also, lethally, she is nearly invisible here, with none of the pressure of public scrutiny. I think I’ve read one upbeat featury thing by the now pathetically lost Hartford Courant profiling her as a mid-career woman who runs marathons.