<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rove Conspired with GOP Techie to Steal Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.locustfork.net/2008/08/did-karl-rove-conspire-with-gop-techie-to-steal-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2008/08/did-karl-rove-conspire-with-gop-techie-to-steal-elections/</link>
	<description>A Wide Open Weblog for Big News, the Big Picture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:37:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: former reporter</title>
		<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2008/08/did-karl-rove-conspire-with-gop-techie-to-steal-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-1831</link>
		<dc:creator>former reporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.locustfork.net/2008/08/21/did-karl-rove-conspire-with-gop-techie-to-steal-elections/#comment-1831</guid>
		<description>For those who many not recognize the deer in the headlights above, that&#039;s Bill Canary, who I don&#039;t believe is identified in the video, but most likely is a part of this nightmare</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who many not recognize the deer in the headlights above, that&#8217;s Bill Canary, who I don&#8217;t believe is identified in the video, but most likely is a part of this nightmare</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glynn Wilson</title>
		<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2008/08/did-karl-rove-conspire-with-gop-techie-to-steal-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>Glynn Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.locustfork.net/2008/08/21/did-karl-rove-conspire-with-gop-techie-to-steal-elections/#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>On this issue, we have digressed from a great democracy to a third-world country. Hopefully enough people are fired up this time around to take the country back from Bush and Rove in a landslide. I don&#039;t think they can steal an election unless it is close.

The problem is, the press here is in collusion with the likes of Rove. Witness the video below on how a Birmingham News reporter was fed information by federal prosecutors to trump up a scandal using a classic Rovian term, &quot;double-dipping.&quot;

I don&#039;t think anyone would accuse the Newhouse papers in Alabama of being the &quot;liberal media.&quot; Obviously their publishers have a &quot;partisan&quot; political agenda, but they are on the right, not the left, of the political spectrum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this issue, we have digressed from a great democracy to a third-world country. Hopefully enough people are fired up this time around to take the country back from Bush and Rove in a landslide. I don&#8217;t think they can steal an election unless it is close.</p>
<p>The problem is, the press here is in collusion with the likes of Rove. Witness the video below on how a Birmingham News reporter was fed information by federal prosecutors to trump up a scandal using a classic Rovian term, &#8220;double-dipping.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone would accuse the Newhouse papers in Alabama of being the &#8220;liberal media.&#8221; Obviously their publishers have a &#8220;partisan&#8221; political agenda, but they are on the right, not the left, of the political spectrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yana Davis</title>
		<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2008/08/did-karl-rove-conspire-with-gop-techie-to-steal-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-1829</link>
		<dc:creator>Yana Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.locustfork.net/2008/08/21/did-karl-rove-conspire-with-gop-techie-to-steal-elections/#comment-1829</guid>
		<description>This is why good old paper ballots, counted by hand in the presence of monitors from all parties competing, is the best guarantee again vote fraud. The old-fashioned process is cumbersome and takes longer than computerized voting, but we should be willing to trade waiting till Wednesday to know who won for instant information that may be based on fraud.

There&#039;s little doubt, in my opinion, that Al Gore actually won Florida in 2000 and there&#039;s a lot of doubt about Ohion in 2004 with the Diebold machines being used. That said, unless the voters demand an electoral process that minimizes the opportunity to steal elections, fraud will continue. When control of the federal power and money machine in DC is at stake, it&#039;s no holds barred for Machiavellians such as Rove.

Reform of how ballot are cast and counted needs to be paired with liberalized ballot access. Today, most states make it extremely difficult and expensive for alternative parties and independent candidates to appear on general election ballots.

Combined with legislative gerrymandering and other built-in advantages of incumbency, the result is a virtual guarantee that no one other than Democrats and Republicans will be elected. The last time a third party candidate actually had a chance of winning the presidency was 1912 when Teddy Roosevelt ran as the Progressive Party nominee. That was 96 years ago.

All of that, coupled with an average turnout nationally of about 50% of the voters over recent decades in major elections, make the democratic process a sham. Elected officials can claim to represent &quot;the will of the people&quot; but that claim, like the process that put them in office, is riddled with corruption and fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why good old paper ballots, counted by hand in the presence of monitors from all parties competing, is the best guarantee again vote fraud. The old-fashioned process is cumbersome and takes longer than computerized voting, but we should be willing to trade waiting till Wednesday to know who won for instant information that may be based on fraud.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s little doubt, in my opinion, that Al Gore actually won Florida in 2000 and there&#8217;s a lot of doubt about Ohion in 2004 with the Diebold machines being used. That said, unless the voters demand an electoral process that minimizes the opportunity to steal elections, fraud will continue. When control of the federal power and money machine in DC is at stake, it&#8217;s no holds barred for Machiavellians such as Rove.</p>
<p>Reform of how ballot are cast and counted needs to be paired with liberalized ballot access. Today, most states make it extremely difficult and expensive for alternative parties and independent candidates to appear on general election ballots.</p>
<p>Combined with legislative gerrymandering and other built-in advantages of incumbency, the result is a virtual guarantee that no one other than Democrats and Republicans will be elected. The last time a third party candidate actually had a chance of winning the presidency was 1912 when Teddy Roosevelt ran as the Progressive Party nominee. That was 96 years ago.</p>
<p>All of that, coupled with an average turnout nationally of about 50% of the voters over recent decades in major elections, make the democratic process a sham. Elected officials can claim to represent &#8220;the will of the people&#8221; but that claim, like the process that put them in office, is riddled with corruption and fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

