<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How the 2002 Election Was Stolen in Bay Minette</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.locustfork.net/2007/06/20/how-the-2002-el/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2007/06/20/how-the-2002-el/</link>
	<description>They Call It MoJo, Short for Mobile Journalism</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Edwin Rudd</title>
		<link>http://blog.locustfork.net/2007/06/20/how-the-2002-el/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin Rudd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 13:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.locustfork.net/index.php/2007/06/20/how-the-2002-election-was-stolen-in-bay-minette/#comment-516</guid>
		<description>The author notes above that:


"According to Auburn University Professor James H. Gundlach, who studied the election and reported his results in a peer reviewed paper presented to the Alabama Political Science Association, there is little doubt that election fraud took place that night in Bay Minette.

For one thing, none of the vote counts for any other candidate changed in that last count, only Siegelman's. And all the votes changed in a negative direction.

"When Baldwin County reported two sets of results, it was clear to me that someone had manipulated the results," Gundlach says. "There is simply no way that electronic vote counting can produce two sets of results without someone using computer programs in ways that were not intended."



I say:  However, it was the first set of results that were statistically out of line with the evening's vote totals and the final reconciliation that made sense.  It was a bad evening and an unfortunate turn of events that our Governor lost, but it really happened.  For the initial totals to stand would have meant that Baldwin County voted different than it ever had in modern history and different than any county had in any Governor's race anywhere with thousands of under votes in the top of the ticket race.  All the change did was bring the Governor's race into line with the other vote totals in the county.  However, if they were trying to manipulate the vote totals from the start in that county that is another story.  That would mean they just botched fixing the election the first time and had to go back and do it again, but then all the totals for the county would be funny and virtually all the polling officials would know about it.  Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author notes above that:</p>
<p>&#8220;According to Auburn University Professor James H. Gundlach, who studied the election and reported his results in a peer reviewed paper presented to the Alabama Political Science Association, there is little doubt that election fraud took place that night in Bay Minette.</p>
<p>For one thing, none of the vote counts for any other candidate changed in that last count, only Siegelman&#8217;s. And all the votes changed in a negative direction.</p>
<p>&#8220;When Baldwin County reported two sets of results, it was clear to me that someone had manipulated the results,&#8221; Gundlach says. &#8220;There is simply no way that electronic vote counting can produce two sets of results without someone using computer programs in ways that were not intended.&#8221;</p>
<p>I say:  However, it was the first set of results that were statistically out of line with the evening&#8217;s vote totals and the final reconciliation that made sense.  It was a bad evening and an unfortunate turn of events that our Governor lost, but it really happened.  For the initial totals to stand would have meant that Baldwin County voted different than it ever had in modern history and different than any county had in any Governor&#8217;s race anywhere with thousands of under votes in the top of the ticket race.  All the change did was bring the Governor&#8217;s race into line with the other vote totals in the county.  However, if they were trying to manipulate the vote totals from the start in that county that is another story.  That would mean they just botched fixing the election the first time and had to go back and do it again, but then all the totals for the county would be funny and virtually all the polling officials would know about it.  Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
